Thanks for your answer Gustavo !
I've tried the new evas_object_image_filled_add() and it works well I
think... for someone who want to fill the complete evas canvas with an image
and resize it when one or the other is resized.
What I wanted to do was to fill the part:swallow with my image in
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Vincent Pomageot
vincent.pomag...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your answer Gustavo !
I've tried the new evas_object_image_filled_add() and it works well I
think... for someone who want to fill the complete evas canvas with an image
and resize it when one or the
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Massimiliano Calamelli
mcalame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 19:44:11 +0100
Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com wrote:
The ninth FOSDEM is a two-day event organized by volunteers to promote
the widespread use of Free and Open Source software.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Cedric BAIL moa.blueb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Massimiliano Calamelli
mcalame...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 19:44:11 +0100
Nicolas Aguirre aguirre.nico...@gmail.com wrote:
The ninth FOSDEM is a two-day event organized by
You're right ! Working perfectly now !
I was associating my image with the canvas... that couldn't work..
Thanks a lot !
2008/12/13 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri barbi...@profusion.mobi
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Vincent Pomageot
vincent.pomag...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your answer
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:18 AM, Nick Hughart mek...@mekius.net wrote:
A better patch would be to remove it completely. None of the code is
useful anymore and efreet_desktop is far better.
Ok. Patch 1 removes Ecore_Desktop from autoconf/automake, Patch 2 does the
same but aditinally removes
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 3:43 PM, thomasg tho...@gstaedtner.net wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:18 AM, Nick Hughart mek...@mekius.net wrote:
A better patch would be to remove it completely. None of the code is
useful anymore and efreet_desktop is far better.
Ok. Patch 1 removes
hey,
I did that code for gettimeofday() for mingw32ce:
+ milli_sec = (int)GetTickCount() - _evil_time_millisecond;
+ tp-tv_sec = _evil_time_second + milli_sec / 1000;
+ tp-tv_usec = (milli_sec % 1000) * 1000;
would it be better that I write the following:
if (milli_sec 1000)
{
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 07:52:52PM +0100, Vincent Torri wrote:
+ milli_sec = (int)GetTickCount() - _evil_time_millisecond;
+ tp-tv_sec = _evil_time_second + milli_sec / 1000;
+ tp-tv_usec = (milli_sec % 1000) * 1000;
would it be better that I write the following:
[snap branched
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 07:52:52PM +0100, Vincent Torri wrote:
+ milli_sec = (int)GetTickCount() - _evil_time_millisecond;
+ tp-tv_sec = _evil_time_second + milli_sec / 1000;
+ tp-tv_usec = (milli_sec % 1000) * 1000;
would it be better
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:25:13PM +0100, Vincent Torri wrote:
Well, maybe you don't know, but the mingw32ce compiler is for the Windows
CE port. So the processors are usually arm type ones (like the Intel
XScale ones). Also there is a dicision and a modulo operations.
Many CPUs also have a
11 matches
Mail list logo
