Re: [E-devel] Settings -> Gadgets Advanced screen

2009-08-19 Thread Christopher Michael
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:59:43 -0300 Luis Felipe Strano Moraes > said: > >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Iván Briano >> (Sachiel) wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Luis Felipe Strano >>> Moraes wrote: Hey, just wondering if the

Re: [E-devel] possible truncation of variable values in eina_fixed_bitmap.c on 64 bits

2009-08-19 Thread Vincent Torri
here is a patch. Another patch would be to cast when computing the delta's. Which one do you prefer ? Vincent Index: eina_fixed_bitmap.c === --- eina_fixed_bitmap.c (revision 41856) +++ eina_fixed_bitmap.c (working copy) @@ -62,8 +

Re: [E-devel] Settings -> Gadgets Advanced screen

2009-08-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:59:43 -0300 Luis Felipe Strano Moraes said: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Iván Briano > (Sachiel) wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Luis Felipe Strano > > Moraes wrote: > >> Hey, > >> > >> just wondering if the current behaviour is expected, when you go into

Re: [E-devel] Documentataion to Edje, Ecore, Evas, Ecore Evas

2009-08-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:07:10 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri said: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Thiago Masaki wrote: > > Well, my doxygen is now like this. > > > > /** > >  * @brief Process object message signal queue > >  * > >  * @param obj The edje object reference. > >  * > >  * This fu

Re: [E-devel] Settings -> Gadgets Advanced screen

2009-08-19 Thread Sachiel
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Luis Felipe Strano Moraes wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Iván Briano > (Sachiel) wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Luis Felipe Strano >> Moraes wrote: >>> Hey, >>> >>> just wondering if the current behaviour is expected, when you go into >>> Sett

Re: [E-devel] Settings -> Gadgets Advanced screen

2009-08-19 Thread Luis Felipe Strano Moraes
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Iván Briano (Sachiel) wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Luis Felipe Strano > Moraes wrote: >> Hey, >> >> just wondering if the current behaviour is expected, when you go into >> Settings->Gadgets >> and click on the Advanced button, you basically go to a com

Re: [E-devel] Settings -> Gadgets Advanced screen

2009-08-19 Thread Sachiel
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Luis Felipe Strano Moraes wrote: > Hey, > > just wondering if the current behaviour is expected, when you go into > Settings->Gadgets > and click on the Advanced button, you basically go to a completely > different screen that > has some background and animations st

[E-devel] Settings -> Gadgets Advanced screen

2009-08-19 Thread Luis Felipe Strano Moraes
Hey, just wondering if the current behaviour is expected, when you go into Settings->Gadgets and click on the Advanced button, you basically go to a completely different screen that has some background and animations stuff in it, but afaict nothing to actually manage gadgets. --lf -- "Sometime

Re: [E-devel] Documentataion to Edje, Ecore, Evas, Ecore Evas

2009-08-19 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Thiago Masaki wrote: > Well, my doxygen is now like this. > > /** >  * @brief Process object message signal queue >  * >  * @param obj The edje object reference. >  * >  * This function goes trough the message queue processing the messages. >  * >  */ > > edje_obje

Re: [E-devel] Documentataion to Edje, Ecore, Evas, Ecore Evas

2009-08-19 Thread Thiago Masaki
Well, my doxygen is now like this. /** * @brief Process object message signal queue * * @param obj The edje object reference. * * This function goes trough the message queue processing the messages. * */ edje_object_message_signal_process(Evas_Object *obj) Anyone disagree ? --

Re: [E-devel] Documentataion to Edje, Ecore, Evas, Ecore Evas

2009-08-19 Thread Thiago Masaki
Doxygen documentation 2009/8/19 Thiago Masaki > The file is > edje/src/lib/edje_message_queue.c > > > -- Thiago R. Masaki ProFUSION embedded systems http://profusion.mobi -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting -

[E-devel] Documentataion to Edje, Ecore, Evas, Ecore Evas

2009-08-19 Thread Thiago Masaki
Hi every one I'm writing oxygen documentation do Edje, Ecore, Evas, Ecore Evas libraries. Looking at some functions I didn't understood the meaning. For example Here is it correct my brief description? In "this function" what this function really does ? /** * @brief Process object message signal

Re: [E-devel] Documentataion to Edje, Ecore, Evas, Ecore Evas

2009-08-19 Thread Thiago Masaki
The file is edje/src/lib/edje_message_queue.c -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best,

Re: [E-devel] possible truncation of variable values in eina_fixed_bitmap.c on 64 bits

2009-08-19 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 02:36:54PM +0200, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> It's not gcc specific other decent compiler support this feature. But >> apparently not suncc, so you can patch if needed. > > void arithmetic is NOT a feature. It is a hist

Re: [E-devel] possible truncation of variable values in eina_fixed_bitmap.c on 64 bits

2009-08-19 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 02:36:54PM +0200, Cedric BAIL wrote: > It's not gcc specific other decent compiler support this feature. But > apparently not suncc, so you can patch if needed. void arithmetic is NOT a feature. It is a historic accident and bug. Code using it is simply broken. Nothing less

Re: [E-devel] possible truncation of variable values in eina_fixed_bitmap.c on 64 bits

2009-08-19 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Cedric BAIL wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2

Re: [E-devel] possible truncation of variable values in eina_fixed_bitmap.c on 64 bits

2009-08-19 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Vincent Torri >>> wrote: On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:40 AM,

Re: [E-devel] possible truncation of variable values in eina_fixed_bitmap.c on 64 bits

2009-08-19 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Vincent Torri >> wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Cedric BAIL wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Vince

Re: [E-devel] possible truncation of variable values in eina_fixed_bitmap.c on 64 bits

2009-08-19 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Vincent Torri >>> wrote: On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Vincent Torri wrote: > > Hey, > > in eina_fixe

Re: [E-devel] possible truncation of variable values in eina_fixed_bitmap.c on 64 bits

2009-08-19 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Vincent Torri >> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Vincent Torri wrote: Hey, in eina_fixed_bitmap.c, lines 68, 88 and 160, offsets are computed

Re: [E-devel] possible truncation of variable values in eina_fixed_bitmap.c on 64 bits

2009-08-19 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Vincent Torri wrote: >>> Hey, >>> >>> in eina_fixed_bitmap.c, lines 68, 88 and 160, offsets are computed and >>> stored in an int. But, if I'm not mistaken, on 64 bits arch, o

Re: [E-devel] possible truncation of variable values in eina_fixed_bitmap.c on 64 bits

2009-08-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:59:50 +0200 Cedric BAIL said: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Vincent Torri wrote: > >> Hey, > >> > >> in eina_fixed_bitmap.c, lines 68, 88 and 160, offsets are computed and > >> stored in an int. But, if I'm not mistaken, o

Re: [E-devel] possible truncation of variable values in eina_fixed_bitmap.c on 64 bits

2009-08-19 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Vincent Torri wrote: >> Hey, >> >> in eina_fixed_bitmap.c, lines 68, 88 and 160, offsets are computed and >> stored in an int. But, if I'm not mistaken, on 64 bits arch, offsets are >> 64 bits long. >> >> Shouldn't we sto

Re: [E-devel] fast decompression lib

2009-08-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:11:43 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri said: > while looking at the doc of UPX, i've found that lossless > (de)compression library: > > http://www.oberhumer.com/opensource/lzo/ > > which says to compress better and to be faster decompression than > >

Re: [E-devel] possible truncation of variable values in eina_fixed_bitmap.c on 64 bits

2009-08-19 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Vincent Torri wrote: > > Hey, > > in eina_fixed_bitmap.c, lines 68, 88 and 160, offsets are computed and > stored in an int. But, if I'm not mistaken, on 64 bits arch, offsets are > 64 bits long. > > Shouldn't we store them in long instead of int ? and technically speaking,

[E-devel] possible truncation of variable values in eina_fixed_bitmap.c on 64 bits

2009-08-19 Thread Vincent Torri
Hey, in eina_fixed_bitmap.c, lines 68, 88 and 160, offsets are computed and stored in an int. But, if I'm not mistaken, on 64 bits arch, offsets are 64 bits long. Shouldn't we store them in long instead of int ? Vincent