Re: [E-devel] Eina is broken (patrch submit)

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:52:08 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Brett Nash wrote: > > > > > The easier fix is to upgrade your automake to 1.10 or later. It > > works fine then. > > > > 1.9 gives the error reported below. > > Can you give the value of builddir and a

Re: [E-devel] Eina is broken (patrch submit)

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Brett Nash wrote: > On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:52:08 +0200 (CEST) > Vincent Torri wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Brett Nash wrote: >> >>> >>> The easier fix is to upgrade your automake to 1.10 or later. It >>> works fine then. >>> >>> 1.9 gives the error reported below

Re: [E-devel] Eina is broken (patrch submit)

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Brett Nash wrote: > > The easier fix is to upgrade your automake to 1.10 or later. It works > fine then. > > 1.9 gives the error reported below. Can you give the value of builddir and abs_builddir in Makefile (in src/lib) with automake 1.9 ? Vincent ---

Re: [E-devel] Eina is broken (patrch submit)

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009, Brett Nash wrote: > Hello All, > > Attached is a patch to check the automake minor version. > > Yes, I'm sure there are more versions that need checking, but > this tripped me, and apparently cantona up.. so it's probably worth the > check. > > Tested again

Re: [E-devel] Eina is broken (patrch submit)

Hello All, Attached is a patch to check the automake minor version. Yes, I'm sure there are more versions that need checking, but this tripped me, and apparently cantona up.. so it's probably worth the check. Tested against automake 1.4, 1.9 and 1.10 (debian). Re

Re: [E-devel] Eina is broken (patrch submit)

The easier fix is to upgrade your automake to 1.10 or later. It works fine then. 1.9 gives the error reported below. Regards, nash [Sending patch shortly] On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:25:46 +0800 cantona wrote: > Hi all, > > Eina is broken...I attached a patch which fixed

Re: [E-devel] NOTICE: svn feature freeze this week (Oct 5-11)

On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:00:04 +1000 David Seikel said: > On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:38:49 +0200 Quaker wrote: > > > So from today to Monday 11, do not commit any features please and > > instead try to fix bugs until FEATURE-LOCKED file disappear in > > trunk :) > > It's the 14th, did I miss the unfr

Re: [E-devel] NOTICE: svn feature freeze this week (Oct 5-11)

On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:38:49 +0200 Quaker wrote: > So from today to Monday 11, do not commit any features please and > instead try to fix bugs until FEATURE-LOCKED file disappear in > trunk :) It's the 14th, did I miss the unfreeze? At least it's the 14th in Estralia. The rest of the world is s

[E-devel] What happened to bugzilla?

Hi all, since some days bugs.enlightenment.org is down. Before someone complains that trac is the way to go, I know, but we still use bugzilla for ewl. So does anybody know what happen to it? Thanks Peter -- Come buil

[E-devel] EET save a listof char *

Hello, In my structure I have a list char * and I don't know how I can save it with EET. Cedric gave me something but it does not work. Here my current code, the list is "collections" http://debian.pastebin.com/mb8a210f If someone has an idea :) -- Regards.

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] Recreating window state problem

Hello I am only refreshing the topic with information how to reproduce the bug using xephyr: 1. # Xephyr :3.0 -ac -br +xinerama -screen 1200x400 2. # enlightenment -fake-xinerama-screen 600x400+0+0 -fake-xinerama-screen 600x400+600+0 3. make sure that IBox is on both screens (i'm not sure if this

Re: [E-devel] Recursive CCing? Was: Choice of a Window Manager

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 05:35:40 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:19:14 +1000 David Seikel > > said: > > > >> > > >> >    Many people find this kind of careless CCism extremely > >> > offensive, and it affe

Re: [E-devel] Recursive CCing? Was: Choice of a Window Manager

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:31:05 -0400 Jose Gonzalez wrote: > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:28:54 +1000 David Seikel > > said: > > > > > >> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:01:13 -0400 Ross Vandegrift > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 06:42:22AM

Re: [E-devel] Recursive CCing? Was: Choice of a Window Manager

Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:28:54 +1000 David Seikel said: > > >> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:01:13 -0400 Ross Vandegrift >> wrote: >> >> >>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 06:42:22AM +1000, David Seikel wrote: >>> Thirdly, and this is most important,

Re: [E-devel] Recursive CCing? Was: Choice of a Window Manager

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:31 AM, Jose Gonzalez wrote: > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:28:54 +1000 David Seikel said: >> >> >>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:01:13 -0400 Ross Vandegrift >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 06:42:22AM +1000, David Seikel wro

Re: [E-devel] Recursive CCing? Was: Choice of a Window Manager

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:19:14 +1000 David Seikel said: > >> > >> >    Many people find this kind of careless CCism extremely offensive, >> > and it affects our ability to build a more inclusive community. >> > >> >    I believe an apology

Re: [E-devel] Recursive CCing? Was: Choice of a Window Manager

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:19:14 +1000 David Seikel said: > > > >Many people find this kind of careless CCism extremely offensive, > > and it affects our ability to build a more inclusive community. > > > >I believe an apology from you is in order, and that you refrain > > from this blatant

Re: [E-devel] Recursive CCing? Was: Choice of a Window Manager

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:31:05 -0400 Jose Gonzalez said: > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:28:54 +1000 David Seikel said: > > > > > >> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:01:13 -0400 Ross Vandegrift > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 06:42:22AM +1000