Re: [E-devel] use of Eina_Bool in ecore_evas

2010-09-24 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:04:39 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) said: On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: Hey, in ecore_evas, there are plenty of calls that can use Eina_Bool instead of int: ecore_evas_engine_type_

Re: [E-devel] use of Eina_Bool in ecore_evas

2010-09-24 Thread Christopher Michael
On 09/24/2010 12:55 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:51:59 -0400 Christopher Michael > said: > >> On 09/24/2010 08:30 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >>> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:04:39 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) >>> said: >>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010

Re: [E-devel] use of Eina_Bool in ecore_evas

2010-09-24 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:51:59 -0400 Christopher Michael said: > On 09/24/2010 08:30 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:04:39 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) > > said: > > > >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > >>> > >>> Hey, > >>> > >>> in eco

Re: [E-devel] use of Eina_Bool in ecore_evas

2010-09-24 Thread Christopher Michael
On 09/24/2010 08:30 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:04:39 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) > said: > >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: >>> >>> Hey, >>> >>> in ecore_evas, there are plenty of calls that can use Eina_Bool instead of >>> int: >>>

Re: [E-devel] Edje API removal.

2010-09-24 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:42:43 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) said: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:00:32 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) > > said: > > > >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Carsten Haitzler > >> wrote: > >> > On Thu, 23 Sep 2010

Re: [E-devel] Edje API removal.

2010-09-24 Thread Sachiel
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:00:32 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) > said: > >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Carsten Haitzler >> wrote: >> > On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:23:27 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) >> > said: >> > >> > this should be fixed t

Re: [E-devel] use of Eina_Bool in ecore_evas

2010-09-24 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:04:39 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) said: On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: Hey, in ecore_evas, there are plenty of calls that can use Eina_Bool instead of int: ecore_evas_engine_type_

Re: [E-devel] use of Eina_Bool in ecore_evas

2010-09-24 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:04:39 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) said: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > > in ecore_evas, there are plenty of calls that can use Eina_Bool instead of > > int: > > > > ecore_evas_engine_type_supported_get > > ecore_evas_app_comp_syn

Re: [E-devel] Edje API removal.

2010-09-24 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:00:32 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) said: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:23:27 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) > > said: > > > > this should be fixed to work again as it was intended to... g. what > > removed it. i K

Re: [E-devel] beta EFL 1.0.0???

2010-09-24 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > i have crazy plans to throw out a beta of EFL this weekend? any objections? > anyone who has stuff to get in to beta - get it in (fixes that is for stuff). > pending issues/bugs - make sure they are brought up and yelled about loudly > he

Re: [E-devel] use of Eina_Bool in ecore_evas

2010-09-24 Thread Sachiel
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > > Hey, > > in ecore_evas, there are plenty of calls that can use Eina_Bool instead of > int: > > ecore_evas_engine_type_supported_get > ecore_evas_app_comp_sync_set > ecore_evas_app_comp_sync_get > all the _set functions that have an 'on' par

Re: [E-devel] Edje API removal.

2010-09-24 Thread Sachiel
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:23:27 -0300 Iván Briano (Sachiel) > said: > > this should be fixed to work again as it was intended to... g. what > removed > it. i KNOW it worked. i implemented it and had it tested and calling > callbacks.

[E-devel] use of Eina_Bool in ecore_evas

2010-09-24 Thread Vincent Torri
Hey, in ecore_evas, there are plenty of calls that can use Eina_Bool instead of int: ecore_evas_engine_type_supported_get ecore_evas_app_comp_sync_set ecore_evas_app_comp_sync_get all the _set functions that have an 'on' parameter and their _get too. Should we modify them before beta ? Vincen

[E-devel] rfc: ecore_con additions proposal

2010-09-24 Thread Chidambar 'ilLogict' Zinnoury
Hello. I'm planning to add support for the SCTP protocol[1] in ecore_con at some point in the near future (after I'm finished with my current playground - more about it real soon), but as API is being frozen, I thought I'd better send this now. SCTP is a modern protocol with some great feature

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_con

2010-09-24 Thread David Seikel
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 23:54:49 -0700 "Enlightenment SVN" wrote: > Log: > add session ticket support for gnutls, also add extremely detailed > handshake error messages > Author: discomfitor > Date: 2010-09-23 23:54:49 -0700 (Thu, 23 Sep 2010) > New Revision: 52675 > > Modified: >

Re: [E-devel] beta EFL 1.0.0???

2010-09-24 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 09:54:49 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri wrote: > > > On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > i have crazy plans to throw out a beta of EFL this weekend? any objections? > > anyone who has stuff to get in to beta - get it in (fixes that is for > > stuf

Re: [E-devel] beta EFL 1.0.0???

2010-09-24 Thread Vincent Torri
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > i have crazy plans to throw out a beta of EFL this weekend? any objections? > anyone who has stuff to get in to beta - get it in (fixes that is for stuff). > pending issues/bugs - make sure they are brought up and yelled about loudly