Re: [E-devel] eina 1.1.0beta patches for/from pkgsrc

On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 08:28:36 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri > said: > >> >> >> On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:41:17 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger >>> said: >>> >>> this is really late..

Re: [E-devel] eina 1.1.0beta patches for/from pkgsrc

On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 08:28:36 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri said: > > > On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:41:17 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger > > said: > > > > this is really late... and a lot of these patches i find questionable. i'll > > question h

Re: [E-devel] eina 1.1.0beta patches for/from pkgsrc

On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:41:17 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger > said: > > this is really late... and a lot of these patches i find questionable. i'll > question here (things not questioned seem ok): > > 1. __SUNPRO_C instead of __sun <- expla

Re: [E-devel] Brokedness.

On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:30:01AM +1000, David Seikel wrote: > Elsa got broken, and I was thinking of actually trying it out soon. > > elsa_gui.c: In function ‘_elsa_gui_users_genlist_set’: > elsa_gui.c:547: error: ‘struct _Elm_Gen_Item_Class_Func’ has no member > named ‘label_get’ elsa_gui.c: In

Re: [E-devel] eina 1.1.0beta patches for/from pkgsrc

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:41:17 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger said: > Hi all, > sorry for not finding the time for doing this earlier. Attached is a > patch that sorts out a number of smaller issues with eina on NetBSD and > Solaris. Some are noise, some are real bugs. This brings it down to one > compile

Re: [E-devel] eina 1.1.0beta patches for/from pkgsrc

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:41:17 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger said: this is really late... and a lot of these patches i find questionable. i'll question here (things not questioned seem ok): 1. __SUNPRO_C instead of __sun <- explain why you dont just ADD an extra || defined(__SUNPRO_C) and why the check

Re: [E-devel] Fix for pulseaudio in e17 on !Linux

On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 05:00:10 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:29:12PM -0500, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > > looks reasonable, but this doesn't exist in pulseaudio's code. is it patched > > during build on bsd? > > The part in iochannel.c is conditionalized on HAVE_CRE

Re: [E-devel] Fix for pulseaudio in e17 on !Linux

On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:29:12PM -0500, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > looks reasonable, but this doesn't exist in pulseaudio's code. is it patched > during build on bsd? The part in iochannel.c is conditionalized on HAVE_CREDS in pulseaudio. Joerg --

Re: [E-devel] New EFL release cycle 1.1/1.5 BETA

On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 04:14:42 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > [patch-src_lib_ecore_ecore__getopt.c text/x-csrc (423 bytes)] > > [patch-src_lib_ecore__file_ecore__file.c text/x-csrc (973 bytes)] in -- All the data co

Re: [E-devel] Fix for pulseaudio in e17 on !Linux

On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 04:12:22 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > Self-explaining. > > --- src/modules/mixer/pa.c.orig 2011-12-02 00:47:27.0 + > +++ src/modules/mixer/pa.c > @@ -350,7 +350,9 @@ con(Pulse *conn, int type __UNUSED__, Ec > INF("connected to %s", ecore_con_server_n

Re: [E-devel] New EFL release cycle 1.1/1.5 BETA

On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 04:14:42 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > [patch-src_lib_ecore__con_ecore__con__ssl.c text/x-csrc (831 bytes)] I removed these since I didn't end up using them. -- All the data continuously generate

Re: [E-devel] New EFL release cycle 1.1/1.5 BETA

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:54:18PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/ecore-1.1.0-beta.tar.gz > http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/ecore-1.1.0-beta.tar.bz2 First patch comments out a bunch of seemingly unused static functions. Second and third patch

[E-devel] Fix for pulseaudio in e17 on !Linux

Self-explaining. --- src/modules/mixer/pa.c.orig 2011-12-02 00:47:27.0 + +++ src/modules/mixer/pa.c @@ -350,7 +350,9 @@ con(Pulse *conn, int type __UNUSED__, Ec INF("connected to %s", ecore_con_server_name_get(ev->server)); conn->fd = dup(ecore_con_server_fd_get(ev->server));

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/elementary/src/lib

Skimmed over, it looked similar with elm_toolbar_item_icon_set( ITEM, FILEPATH ). -Regards, Hermet- -Original Message- From: "Enlightenment SVN" To: [email protected] Cc: Sent: 11-12-02(금) 04:14:49 Sub

Re: [E-devel] Brokedness.

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 20:51:31 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:47:20 +1000 > David Seikel wrote: > > > On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 20:37:18 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:30:01 +1000 > > > David Seikel wrote: > > > > > > > Elsa got broken

Re: [E-devel] Brokedness.

On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:47:20 +1000 David Seikel wrote: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 20:37:18 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz > wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:30:01 +1000 > > David Seikel wrote: > > > > > Elsa got broken, and I was thinking of actually trying it out soon. > > > > > > elsa_gui.c: In fun

Re: [E-devel] Brokedness.

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 20:37:18 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:30:01 +1000 > David Seikel wrote: > > > Elsa got broken, and I was thinking of actually trying it out soon. > > > > elsa_gui.c: In function ‘_elsa_gui_users_genlist_set’: > > elsa_gui.c:547: error: ‘struct _E

Re: [E-devel] Brokedness.

On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:30:01 +1000 David Seikel wrote: > Elsa got broken, and I was thinking of actually trying it out soon. > > elsa_gui.c: In function ‘_elsa_gui_users_genlist_set’: > elsa_gui.c:547: error: ‘struct _Elm_Gen_Item_Class_Func’ has no member > named ‘label_get’ elsa_gui.c: In funct

[E-devel] Brokedness.

Elsa got broken, and I was thinking of actually trying it out soon. elsa_gui.c: In function ‘_elsa_gui_users_genlist_set’: elsa_gui.c:547: error: ‘struct _Elm_Gen_Item_Class_Func’ has no member named ‘label_get’ elsa_gui.c: In function ‘_elsa_gui_users_gengrid_set’: elsa_gui.c:568: error: ‘struct

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: cedric trunk/elementary/src/examples

On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 09:22:14 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo wrote: > I have a long way to go to join to svn borker group. > > Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) > > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Enlightenment SVN > wrote: > > Log: > > elementary: fix massive breakage. > > > >  Someone learned to well from

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: cedric trunk/elementary/src/examples

I have a long way to go to join to svn borker group. Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > elementary: fix massive breakage. > >  Someone learned to well from me... > > > Author:       cedric > Date:         2011-12-01 08:53:57 -0800 (Thu, 01

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/elementary/src/lib

On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 08:34:55 +0900 ChunEon Park wrote: > Skimming over, it looks same with elm_toolbar_item_icon_set(). > > -Regards, Hermet- > > -Original Message- > From: "Enlightenment SVN" > To: enlightenment-...@lists

Re: [E-devel] New EFL release cycle 1.1/1.5 BETA

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:53:49 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger said: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:54:18PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/eet-1.5.0-beta.tar.gz > > http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/eet-1.5.0-beta.tar.bz2 > > Copyright question for thi

Re: [E-devel] New EFL release cycle 1.1/1.5 BETA

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 21:31:17 +0100 Andreas Volz said: > Am Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:54:18 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The > Rasterman): > > Hi, > > Could you please tell us the SVN revision from which this BETA is > build? (maybe 65648; assuming from the SVN logs?) > > I like to setup a system w

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/elementary/src/lib

Skimming over, it looks same with elm_toolbar_item_icon_set(). -Regards, Hermet- -Original Message- From: "Enlightenment SVN" To: [email protected] Cc: Sent: 11-12-02(금) 04:14:49 Subject: E SVN: disco

Re: [E-devel] New EFL release cycle 1.1/1.5 BETA

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 23:26:25 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:54:18PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/edje-1.1.0-beta.tar.gz > > http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/edje-1.1.0-beta.tar.bz2 > > Default is installing t

Re: [E-devel] New EFL release cycle 1.1/1.5 BETA

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:54:18PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/edje-1.1.0-beta.tar.gz > http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/edje-1.1.0-beta.tar.bz2 Default is installing the examples. This introduces a dependency on $(SRCDIR)/Vera.ttf, which i

Re: [E-devel] image pixel data

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 13:08:41 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 12:31:53 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 22:21:33 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz > > said: > > > > > On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:48:33 +0900 > > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman

Re: [E-devel] New EFL release cycle 1.1/1.5 BETA

Am Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:54:18 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): Hi, Could you please tell us the SVN revision from which this BETA is build? (maybe 65648; assuming from the SVN logs?) I like to setup a system with easy_e17.sh and give this revision to the script. Do you think it's

Re: [E-devel] image pixel data

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 12:31:53 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 22:21:33 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz > said: > > > On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:48:33 +0900 > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:37:40 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz > >

Re: [E-devel] New EFL release cycle 1.1/1.5 BETA

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:54:18PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/eet-1.5.0-beta.tar.gz > http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/eet-1.5.0-beta.tar.bz2 Copyright question for this. Unlike eet 1.2, this now installs a bunch of example files by defaul

[E-devel] eina 1.1.0beta patches for/from pkgsrc

Hi all, sorry for not finding the time for doing this earlier. Attached is a patch that sorts out a number of smaller issues with eina on NetBSD and Solaris. Some are noise, some are real bugs. This brings it down to one compiler warning for iconv, which is expected (and messy). Joerg Use the SunP

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH 1/2] elementary: gettextize

On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:38:51PM +0200, Tom Hacohen wrote: > Doesn't this essentially make elementary to depend on a very new gettext? True, I've noticed this version in PROTO/e_pattern_lock/configure.ac:AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0.18.1]) PROTO/enna-explorer/configure.ac:AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION([0.

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH 1/2] elementary: gettextize

Doesn't this essentially make elementary to depend on a very new gettext? -- Tom. On 01/12/11 17:22, Martin Jansa wrote: > * was complaining about wrong version >*** error: gettext infrastructure mismatch: using a Makefile.in.in from > gettext version 0.17 but the autoconf macros are from ge

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH 1/2] elementary: gettextize

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Martin Jansa wrote: > * was complaining about wrong version > *** error: gettext infrastructure mismatch: using a Makefile.in.in from > gettext version 0.17 but the autoconf macros are from gettext version 0.18 > > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa > --- > elementary/Makefile.am

[E-devel] [PATCH 2/2] elsa: fix to build really without PAM support if PAM is disabled or not available

From: Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann * there as still issues in runtime without PAM, but at least it builds now without PAM support and it's good start Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa --- PROTO/elsa/configure.ac |2 +- PROTO/elsa/src/daemon/Makefile.am|6 -- PROTO/elsa/src/

[E-devel] [PATCH 1/2] elementary: gettextize

* was complaining about wrong version *** error: gettext infrastructure mismatch: using a Makefile.in.in from gettext version 0.17 but the autoconf macros are from gettext version 0.18 Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa --- elementary/Makefile.am |2 +- elementary/configure.ac |4 ++-- elem

Re: [E-devel] New EFL release cycle 1.1/1.5 BETA

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:57:54 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:14:21 +0100 Cedric BAIL > said: > > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Tom Hacohen > > wrote: > > > On 01/12/11 08:00, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > >> how's everyone feel about we cu

[E-devel] FW: E SVN: hermet trunk/elementary/src/lib

in 65759. Thank you. -Regards, Hermet- -Original Message- From: "Enlightenment SVN" To: [email protected] Cc: Sent: 11-12-01(목) 20:41:48 Subject: E SVN: hermet trunk/elementary/src/lib Log: elementary

Re: [E-devel] Juggling priorities.

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 21:22:05 +1000 David Seikel said: > On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 19:37:16 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:51:26 +1000 David Seikel > > said: > > > > > While I'm happy that EFL is working on the tiny little embedded > > > 800MHz 486 board,

Re: [E-devel] Juggling priorities.

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 19:37:16 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:51:26 +1000 David Seikel > said: > > > While I'm happy that EFL is working on the tiny little embedded > > 800MHz 486 board, it might be a tad underpowered. > > > > At one point during this devic

Re: [E-devel] Juggling priorities.

On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:51:26 +1000 David Seikel said: > While I'm happy that EFL is working on the tiny little embedded 800MHz > 486 board, it might be a tad underpowered. > > At one point during this devices typical usage, it has to send stuff to > a serial printer, play a sound (through a USB

Re: [E-devel] New EFL release cycle 1.1/1.5 BETA

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 09:14:21 +0100 Cedric BAIL said: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Tom Hacohen > wrote: > > On 01/12/11 08:00, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > >> how's everyone feel about we cut the release to be gold now? it seems > >> there's basically nothing left to be fixed. we

Re: [E-devel] New EFL release cycle 1.1/1.5 BETA

On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > On 01/12/11 08:00, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> how's everyone feel about we cut the release to be gold now? it seems there's >> basically nothing left to be fixed. we can unfreeze svn for new features >> then. >> >> any objection