On 17/12/11 22:27, Vincent Torri wrote:
> Hey,
>
> just read the instructions in that file
>
> http://dev.enlightenment.fr/~doursse/mingw-w64-x86_32/README.txt
>
> I'll do an NSIS package soon with only the EFL 1.1.0 (hence no elementary)
Cool. I should really get myself a windows box to test i
Hey,
just read the instructions in that file
http://dev.enlightenment.fr/~doursse/mingw-w64-x86_32/README.txt
I'll do an NSIS package soon with only the EFL 1.1.0 (hence no elementary)
Vincent
--
Learn Windows Azure Li
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 05:30:31 -0500 Youness Alaoui
said:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 10:32:36 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > said:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > To avoid getting into the same situation as the current one, I'd like
>
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 05:14:21 -0500 Youness Alaoui
said:
> Hi all,
> A bit late to the party, I've been (and still am) very busy lately!
>
> What a nice surprise! Carsten, that's a very good idea, I agree and support
> the move to a single tree!
> Actually, what do you think about having one tree
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 05:14:21 -0500 Youness Alaoui
wrote:
> progress bar, etc... Yes, autofoo is bad, but we all know it and love
> it..
I suspect a lot of us hate it, I do.
--
A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signa
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 10:32:36 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > To avoid getting into the same situation as the current one, I'd like
> > to have a plan for the next release.
> >
> > I believe we should move to t
Hi all,
A bit late to the party, I've been (and still am) very busy lately!
What a nice surprise! Carsten, that's a very good idea, I agree and support
the move to a single tree!
Actually, what do you think about having one tree for core libs and one for
toolkits like glib and gtk having separate