Re: [E-devel] installation of the EFL 1.1.0 on Windows, with MSYS/MinGW

2011-12-17 Thread Tom Hacohen
On 17/12/11 22:27, Vincent Torri wrote: > Hey, > > just read the instructions in that file > > http://dev.enlightenment.fr/~doursse/mingw-w64-x86_32/README.txt > > I'll do an NSIS package soon with only the EFL 1.1.0 (hence no elementary) Cool. I should really get myself a windows box to test i

[E-devel] installation of the EFL 1.1.0 on Windows, with MSYS/MinGW

2011-12-17 Thread Vincent Torri
Hey, just read the instructions in that file http://dev.enlightenment.fr/~doursse/mingw-w64-x86_32/README.txt I'll do an NSIS package soon with only the EFL 1.1.0 (hence no elementary) Vincent -- Learn Windows Azure Li

Re: [E-devel] Planning next Release of EFL

2011-12-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 05:30:31 -0500 Youness Alaoui said: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > > On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 10:32:36 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > > said: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > To avoid getting into the same situation as the current one, I'd like >

Re: [E-devel] new build tree for efl.

2011-12-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 05:14:21 -0500 Youness Alaoui said: > Hi all, > A bit late to the party, I've been (and still am) very busy lately! > > What a nice surprise! Carsten, that's a very good idea, I agree and support > the move to a single tree! > Actually, what do you think about having one tree

Re: [E-devel] new build tree for efl.

2011-12-17 Thread David Seikel
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 05:14:21 -0500 Youness Alaoui wrote: > progress bar, etc... Yes, autofoo is bad, but we all know it and love > it.. I suspect a lot of us hate it, I do. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world. signa

Re: [E-devel] Planning next Release of EFL

2011-12-17 Thread Youness Alaoui
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 10:32:36 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > said: > > > Hi all, > > > > To avoid getting into the same situation as the current one, I'd like > > to have a plan for the next release. > > > > I believe we should move to t

Re: [E-devel] new build tree for efl.

2011-12-17 Thread Youness Alaoui
Hi all, A bit late to the party, I've been (and still am) very busy lately! What a nice surprise! Carsten, that's a very good idea, I agree and support the move to a single tree! Actually, what do you think about having one tree for core libs and one for toolkits like glib and gtk having separate