Thanks Robert :) I will have a look at these today.
I still do not have my svn firewall exception at work yet so I cannot commit
these just yet, but I will combine them with the changes I have here locally,
and when I can finally commit stuff from work, then it will go in along with
the
Hi
The more item should be not counted.
I changed the toolbar code.
Please refer to revision 71096.
Thanks.
--
Jaehwan Kim.
2012년 5월 13일 일요일에 Michael Blumenkrantz님이 작성:
when you create a toolbar, it automagically creates a more menu toolbar
item
(SHRINK_MENU) by default. this creates a
On 15/05/12 12:35, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
Hello,
elm_layout_text_set instead of elm_layout_part_text_set?
For elm_object, we supported elm_object_part_text_set and elm_object_text_set.
But you need a name for setting the default part.
--
Tom.
2012/5/15 Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Davide Andreoli d...@gurumeditation.it
wrote:
Arghh, sorry, my fault.
Ok, now we are destroying the 1.0 branch! also your fix is wrong :(
atm this code is working only because Listing_Request struct and
Ecore (wayland): Refactor out SHM pool allocation to common location
Also adjust the pool calculation algorithm so that that each time the pool
exhausted allocate a pool that is 50% bigger than needed. This should give
some scope to reuse the existing allocation to ensure a
Thanks Robert :-) I will have a look tomorrow morning first thing. Cheers.
Dh
Sent from Samsung mobile
Original message
Subject: Wayland: Refactor out SHM pool creation
From: Bradford, Robert robert.bradf...@intel.com
To: Enlightenment developer list
Raphael Kubo da Costa rak...@freebsd.org writes:
I was working on some code which uses evas_object_image_memfile_set here
on FreeBSD, and it was failing.
After some investigation, I found out that the problem was in the stat()
call in evas_cache_image_request.
On Linux, _create_tmpf()
FreeBSD 4.x was released more than a decade ago (the project itself only
supports FreeBSD = 7 these days), so the check for __FreeBSD_version =
420001 is not necessary anymore (plus it probably never worked, as that
macro is defined in sys/param.h, which is not included prior to the
check).
