I agree with your opinion. I reverted it.
The correctness should be discussed at elm 2.0.
Thanks.
--
Jaehwan Kim.
2012년 5월 18일 금요일에 Michael Blumenkrantz님이 작성:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 18:37:51 -0700
Enlightenment SVN no-re...@enlightenment.org javascript:; wrote:
Log:
The separator is not a
The API documentation says
*Returns:*1 or greater on success, 0 otherwise
The API behaviour should be consistent with the above.
Regards,
Sanjeev
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:20 AM, ChunEon Park her...@naver.com wrote:
Regardless with user's mistake,
The case, under 0 initialization time,
---
.../elementary/elementary.c_elementary_radio.pxi | 44 +---
.../include/elementary/c_elementary.pxd| 12 +++---
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/python-elementary/elementary/elementary.c_elementary_radio.pxi
---
.../elementary.c_elementary_progressbar.pxi| 77 ++--
.../include/elementary/c_elementary.pxd| 21 --
2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/python-elementary/elementary/elementary.c_elementary_progressbar.pxi
---
.../elementary/elementary.c_elementary_photo.pxi | 46 +---
.../include/elementary/c_elementary.pxd|9 +++-
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/python-elementary/elementary/elementary.c_elementary_photo.pxi
hmm.. setting up the icon does not affect the label. signal emit functions
in the check_string() take care of label positioning. if the check_string()
is not called (or before check_string() is called), icon would be arranged
position at the middle of item and label is at the right side of icon.
---
python-elementary/elementary/__init__.py |7 +
.../elementary/elementary.c_elementary_toolbar.pxi | 277 ++--
.../include/elementary/c_elementary.pxd| 87 --
3 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 213 deletions(-)
diff --git
---
.../elementary/elementary.c_elementary_panel.pxi | 13 -
.../include/elementary/c_elementary.pxd | 18 +-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/python-elementary/elementary/elementary.c_elementary_panel.pxi
Hi,
The language settings module uses the wrong flag for the en_GB locale,
please find a patch attached to fix this.
Cheers
Ian
0001-Use-correct-flag-for-en_GB-locale.patch
Description: Binary data
--
Live Security
in svn, thanks
Vincent
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Ian Lee ian.rob@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The language settings module uses the wrong flag for the en_GB locale,
please find a patch attached to fix this.
Cheers
Ian
Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at profusion.mobi writes:
While that would work in theory, it also requires one to have an
fdescfs mounted and still isn't very portable. The renaming is
indeed a hack -- what I wonder is if it is worth keeping.As
you noticed, any code path that calls
People seem to have some problems with the version of gnu_gettext in
ecore and e as reported in the ticket[1].
This very tiny and trivial patch changes the Hard-coded version from
0.17 to 0.18.
[1]http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/ticket/951
--
Regards,
Alex-P. Natsios
(a.k.a Drakevr)
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Alex-P. Natsios apnats...@gmail.com wrote:
People seem to have some problems with the version of gnu_gettext in
ecore and e as reported in the ticket[1].
This very tiny and trivial patch changes the Hard-coded version from
0.17 to 0.18.
the patch won't be
the patch won't be applied, because one person (Michael Jennings) is
maintaining old distros that do not have gettext 0.18
Vincent
I see, these distros still exist :p
In that case its better not applied, should the ticket also be set to
closed , WILLNOTFIX with the same reason?
--
Regards,
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Alex-P. Natsios apnats...@gmail.com wrote:
the patch won't be applied, because one person (Michael Jennings) is
maintaining old distros that do not have gettext 0.18
Vincent
I see, these distros still exist :p
In that case its better not applied, should
grep -Eo '[0-9]*\.[0-9]*\.[0-9]*'
Actually sed has 2 different versions in these systems, there is a gnu
and bsd version while Grep is the same in both iirc.
Maybe grep can be used in its place? this oneliner should match the
version in all systems.
--
Regards,
Alex-P. Natsios
(a.k.a Drakevr)
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Alex-P. Natsios apnats...@gmail.com wrote:
grep -Eo '[0-9]*\.[0-9]*\.[0-9]*'
Actually sed has 2 different versions in these systems, there is a gnu
and bsd version while Grep is the same in both iirc.
Maybe grep can be used in its place? this oneliner should
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Alex-P. Natsios apnats...@gmail.com wrote:
grep -Eo '[0-9]*\.[0-9]*\.[0-9]*'
Actually sed has 2 different versions in these systems, there is a gnu
and bsd version while Grep is the
18 matches
Mail list logo
