On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:43:05 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> said:
>> > - changed command parsing... uses $SHELL and can do $SHELL -c
>> > $COMMAND if it seems to be
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:43:05 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
> > - changed command parsing... uses $SHELL and can do $SHELL -c
> > $COMMAND if it seems to be a shell expression.
> >
> > - use ecore_getopt!
> >
> > - use
Wow.. This is awesome. Terminology enhanced a lot during the weekend.
Thanks to caro, raster, k-s.
I need to update the blog post for Terminology because it was changed
a lot since I wrote the last writing.
http://seoz.egloos.com/3850971
I got questions from people out there and they showed intere
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:43:05 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:57:15 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > said:
> >
> >> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> >> wrote:
> >> > So I got a litt
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:57:15 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>> > So I got a little bit of stuff done while on holiday the week before
>> > last...
>> > and i wrote
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 11:57:15 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > So I got a little bit of stuff done while on holiday the week before last...
> > and i wrote a terminal emulator. it's from scratch, so not a port of an
> > existing
Hi all,
I did some changes to terminology, since SVN commit mails are br0ken
here follows my hint:
* configuration using XDG_CONFIG_HOME for configuration files
(instead of ~/.terminology, it's ~/.config/terminology)
* internally each object contains a different configuration. Can load
and sa
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:11:43 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:35:29 +0200 Vincent Torri
> > said:
> >
> >> hey
> >>
> >> what about separate the app into lib + app, to have a terminal in
> >> an elm obj
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:35:29 +0200 Vincent Torri
> said:
>
>> hey
>>
>> what about separate the app into lib + app, to have a terminal in an
>> elm object ? It was a remark of Puppet. I don't know if it is useful
>> or not. Just a note.
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> So I got a little bit of stuff done while on holiday the week before last...
> and i wrote a terminal emulator. it's from scratch, so not a port of an
> existing one. This of course means the terminal emulation bit is definitely
> not
> t
On 06/17/2012 11:21 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> So I got a little bit of stuff done while on holiday the week before last...
> and i wrote a terminal emulator. it's from scratch, so not a port of an
> existing one. This of course means the terminal emulation bit is definitely
> n
frankly speaking, there's not many candidates of terminal emulator.
most of times, i used gnome-terminal but it sometimes makes annoying
w/o gnome-setting-daemons.
so i'm used xfce4-terminal.
now i'm very happy to use terminology. that means i don't need to
install other libs.
and i can contribute
in with a bit of fix, thx !!!
2012/6/15 Daniel Willmann
> Hello,
>
> I have added an example for the unit format function to the progress bar
> example. Please see the attached patch.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel Willmann
>
--
Michaël Bouchaud (yoz)
--
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:35:29 +0200 Vincent Torri said:
> hey
>
> what about separate the app into lib + app, to have a terminal in an
> elm object ? It was a remark of Puppet. I don't know if it is useful
> or not. Just a note.
its on the TODO list. when its more settled and mature. as such we
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:35:29 +0200 Vincent Torri
wrote:
> what about separate the app into lib + app, to have a terminal in an
> elm object ? It was a remark of Puppet. I don't know if it is useful
> or not. Just a note.
There already exists such a thing, and it is useful. So a good idea.
So y
hey
what about separate the app into lib + app, to have a terminal in an
elm object ? It was a remark of Puppet. I don't know if it is useful
or not. Just a note.
Vincent
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive liv
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:21:17 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
said:
and obligatory screenshot of it working:
http://www.enlightenment.org/ss/e-4fddb1d9311992.92464514.jpg
doesn't do it justice as it's ... static.
> So I got a little bit of stuff done while on holiday the week before last
So I got a little bit of stuff done while on holiday the week before last...
and i wrote a terminal emulator. it's from scratch, so not a port of an
existing one. This of course means the terminal emulation bit is definitely not
totally all there. It needs work, but it's usable enough to the point
18 matches
Mail list logo
