dear all, hello
i have attached a patch which has access feature for the multibuttonentry.
it was hard time to implement access feature on the multibuttonentry than
others.
anyhow.. please review the patch and give feedback. thanks.
cordially,
shinwoo kim.
multibuttonentry.access.diff
Descripti
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> autoreconf doesnt work... so lets have autogen.sh eh? :) also - old
> habits die hard. :)
it perfectly works for the rest of the world... If it does not works,
then you did something wrong
Vincent
>
>
>
> Author: raster
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:00:21 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> #2 - every dependency is mandatory: no more optional libjpeg,
> fontconfig and so on. No more "automagic" detection that silently
> causes problems for 99% of users (why can't I see text in e17? why
> can't I view png?)
>
>
Tom Hacohen wrote:
>On 26/09/12 21:33, Christopher Michael wrote:
>> Everyone is entitled to their own opinions I suppose ;)
>
>Don't worry, I'll help Etrunko sneak the code back in ;P
>
>--
>Tom.
Eh, whatever. Do what ever the heck you want.
dh
--
Sent from my Samsung phone.
---
On Wednesday, September 26, 2012, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Vincent Torri
> >
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > > wrote:
> >> As discussed with Vincent at IRC, and based on previous in-person talk
> with
> >> Raster and
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> As discussed with Vincent at IRC, and based on previous in-person talk with
>> Raster and Cedric, here follows the proposal to cleanup the efl/ (merged)
>> build sys
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:26:37 -0300 Leandro Dorileo
said:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 07:22:35PM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
> > Hey
> >
> > some news: i've merged evil, eina and eet in trunk/efl/
> >
> > Some problems / remarks
> >
> > 1) doc must be fixed. I can be a good oppor
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:29:39 +0200 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 26/09/12 21:19, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Enlightenment SVN
> > wrote:
> >> Log:
> >> Ecore_Evas (wayland): Remove goto. (don't need them, don't want them)
> >
> > Why? There is goto all over the
On 26/09/12 21:33, Christopher Michael wrote:
> Everyone is entitled to their own opinions I suppose ;)
Don't worry, I'll help Etrunko sneak the code back in ;P
--
Tom.
--
How fast is your code?
3 out of 4 devs don\\\'t
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed with Vincent at IRC, and based on previous in-person talk with
> Raster and Cedric, here follows the proposal to cleanup the efl/ (merged)
> build system.
>
> PRE-NOTICE: this is the initial step and won't
"Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)" wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Christopher Michael
> wrote:
>> On 26/09/12 20:29, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> On 26/09/12 21:19, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> Ecore_Evas (wayland):
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Christopher Michael
wrote:
> On 26/09/12 20:29, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 26/09/12 21:19, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Enlightenment SVN
>>> wrote:
Log:
Ecore_Evas (wayland): Remove goto. (don't need them, don't want
Hi all,
As discussed with Vincent at IRC, and based on previous in-person talk with
Raster and Cedric, here follows the proposal to cleanup the efl/ (merged)
build system.
PRE-NOTICE: this is the initial step and won't please everybody. If you're
case is not in the initial proposal, bear with me
On 26/09/12 20:29, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 26/09/12 21:19, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Enlightenment SVN
>> wrote:
>>> Log:
>>> Ecore_Evas (wayland): Remove goto. (don't need them, don't want them)
>>
>> Why? There is goto all over the code.
>
> Yeah. Furtherm
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 26/09/12 21:19, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Enlightenment SVN
>> wrote:
>>> Log:
>>> Ecore_Evas (wayland): Remove goto. (don't need them, don't want them)
>>
>> Why? There is goto all over the code.
>
>
On 26/09/12 21:19, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
>> Log:
>> Ecore_Evas (wayland): Remove goto. (don't need them, don't want them)
>
> Why? There is goto all over the code.
Yeah. Furthermore, in my point of view, the code you removed i
On 26/09/12 20:20, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Enlightenment SVN
>> wrote:
>>> Log:
>>> Ecore_Evas (wayland): Remove goto. (don't need them, don't want them)
>>
>> Why? There is goto all over
On 26/09/12 20:19, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
>> Log:
>> Ecore_Evas (wayland): Remove goto. (don't need them, don't want them)
>
> Why? There is goto all over the code.
Ummm, not in the wayland stuff there is not ;) Unless someone s
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Eduardo Lima (Etrunko)
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
>> Log:
>> Ecore_Evas (wayland): Remove goto. (don't need them, don't want them)
>
> Why? There is goto all over the code.
And your commit leaves the file open if nothing
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> Ecore_Evas (wayland): Remove goto. (don't need them, don't want them)
Why? There is goto all over the code.
> ;) Also, remove an extra blank line that got in there.
>
>
>
> Author: devilhorns
> Date: 2012-09-26 12
On 26/09/12 17:59, Vincent Torri wrote:
> In addition, you
> don't have to re-run the configure script if you actually want to run
> the tests later.
Yeah, and that's the biggest benefit, and that's why it was changed to
be this way in the first place... :)
--
Tom.
-
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Leandro Dorileo wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 05:36:04PM +0200, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 26/09/12 17:26, Leandro Dorileo wrote:
>> > 3) Are we going to have options to disable building examples and tests?
>> > Well, I
>> > know it's meant to be buil
Hi Tom,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 05:36:04PM +0200, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 26/09/12 17:26, Leandro Dorileo wrote:
> > 3) Are we going to have options to disable building examples and tests?
> > Well, I
> > know it's meant to be built in a different make rule, but, having options to
> > disable it
hey
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Leandro Dorileo wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 07:22:35PM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
>> Hey
>>
>> some news: i've merged evil, eina and eet in trunk/efl/
>>
>> Some problems / remarks
>>
>> 1) doc must be fixed. I can be a good opportunity t
On 26/09/12 17:26, Leandro Dorileo wrote:
> 3) Are we going to have options to disable building examples and tests? Well,
> I
> know it's meant to be built in a different make rule, but, having options to
> disable it avoids checking for dependencies and everything else for every lib
> tests and e
Hi Vincent,
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 07:22:35PM +0200, Vincent Torri wrote:
> Hey
>
> some news: i've merged evil, eina and eet in trunk/efl/
>
> Some problems / remarks
>
> 1) doc must be fixed. I can be a good opportunity to improve even more the
> doc.
> 2) I've appended to NEWS, ChangeLog a
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 06:28:02PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:57:08 +0200 Tomas Cech said:
can u try svn eet now? i put in what i know is a definite fix, but i do not
know if it fixed all things for u.
Problem seems to be gone. PowerPC build seems to pass.
Go
Hello.
On 26/09/12 12:56, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
>> Log:
>> PROTO/elocation: Handle GetAddress method and signal
>>
>> Author: stefan
>> Date: 2012-09-26 03:48:34 -0700 (Wed, 26 Sep 2012)
>> New Revision: 77083
>> Trac:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> PROTO/elocation: Handle GetAddress method and signal
>
> Author: stefan
> Date: 2012-09-26 03:48:34 -0700 (Wed, 26 Sep 2012)
> New Revision: 77083
> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/77083
>
> M
Hi all,
When using ecore_con as a https server and trying to connect to it on
non-secure http (using curl or wget), I get SPANKED on server side.
I used the provided sample program ecore_con_server_simple_example.c.
ERR<313>:ecore_con ecore_con_ssl.c:1888
_ecore_con_ssl_client_init_opens
30 matches
Mail list logo
