Re: [E-devel] [ecore] Recursive rm

2012-10-14 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:21:27 +0200 rustyBSD said: > Hi, > I looked at the ecore_file_recursive_rm() function > (in ecore/src/lib/ecore_file/), and I wonder why this > is so ugly/complicated. > > We are doing a readlink() and two stat(). Why not simply > do a lstat() ? > > It takes less memory a

Re: [E-devel] Add Null checking routine

2012-10-14 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:46:49 +0200 Zbigniew Kosinski said: thanks! in svn it is! > Hi, > I prepared patch - check eet file pointer parameter in > eet_identity_signature, eet_identity_x509 and eet_identity_sha1 functions. > Please take a look at attached files. BR, > Zbigniew [SPRC] > -Origin

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: cedric trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_con

2012-10-14 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012 15:10:14 +0200 Vincent Torri said: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Enlightenment SVN > wrote: > > Log: > > ecore: let's try another approach thanks to Guillaume Friloux. > > > > > > Author: cedric > > Date: 2012-10-05 06:07:14 -0700 (Fri, 05 Oct 2012) > > New R

Re: [E-devel] [patch][elementary] toolbar - highlighting item on access

2012-10-14 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012 18:12:31 +0900 Kim Shinwoo said: > dear all, hello. > > the current toolbar does not show highlight effect on accessibility mode. > the attached would give the highlight to toolbar item. > please review the patch and give feedback. thanks. in da esssveeenz yo! > cordially,

Re: [E-devel] E17 and vmware workstation

2012-10-14 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 16:31:55 +0800 stroodlepup said: > E17 has quirks on vmware; some keys do not respond properly when vmware > grabs system input, and returns grabbed input via keyboard shortcut > to anyone who has a fix, please reply... > a fix is badly needed, please help... when VMWARE

Re: [E-devel] [Bug Report] [Elementary] elm_gengrid_item_show/_bring_in APIs are not working properly in some cases.

2012-10-14 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:08:51 +0900 DUBEYPRINCE KUMAR said: > Yes, I have filed the bug in trac. I tried to fix it, but it was bit complex > to me. So, just notified others about it :). But in the mean time I sent > another patch to fix another bug in genlist :). ok. just checking. that will need

Re: [E-devel] [PATCH] ecore/ecore_directfb: Fix a pedantic bug

2012-10-14 Thread Daniel Juyung Seo
Good catch :) Thanks in SVN! http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/77971 Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Vikram Narayanan wrote: > Though someone can argue it is correct, (as the two structures have the > same size and numbers) it gives a room for a little confusion

Re: [E-devel] [Bug Report] [Elementary] elm_gengrid_item_show/_bring_in APIs are not working properly in some cases.

2012-10-14 Thread DUBEYPRINCE KUMAR
Yes, I have filed the bug in trac. I tried to fix it, but it was bit complex to me. So, just notified others about it :). But in the mean time I sent another patch to fix another bug in genlist :). -Original Message- From: Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [mailto:ras...@rasterman.com] Sen

Re: [E-devel] [Bug Report] [Elementary] elm_gengrid_item_show/_bring_in APIs are not working properly in some cases.

2012-10-14 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 09:05:59 + (GMT) PRINCE KUMAR DUBEY said: > Hi, > > This is regarding the Bug in elm_gengrid. > When gengrid is created and launched, particular gengrid item can't be shown > at this time using following APIs elm_gengrid_item_show() and > elm_gengrid_item_bring_in(). Abov

[E-devel] [PATCH] ecore/ecore_directfb: Fix a pedantic bug

2012-10-14 Thread Vikram Narayanan
Though someone can argue it is correct, (as the two structures have the same size and numbers) it gives a room for a little confusion. ~Vikram >From b7522d0f6a7e1ddc254f1120ac65c1d3f7fd07ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vikram Narayanan Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:57:05 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] eco

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: rui trunk/PROTO/eobj

2012-10-14 Thread Vincent Torri
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > Initial rpm spec support. > > > Author: rui > Date: 2012-10-14 09:38:23 -0700 (Sun, 14 Oct 2012) > New Revision: 77966 > Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/77966 > > Added: > trunk/PROTO/eobj/eo

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-14 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 11:40:36 +0200 Ralph Sennhauser said: > On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:37:11 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > > So again: Either force-disable/force-enable a feature or allow > > > configure switches for it, automagic just causes more confusion and > > > more wo

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-14 Thread Ralph Sennhauser
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 11:40:36 +0200 Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > Automagic deps are harder to spot and need to be treated as hard > dependencies in source based distros unless the packager patchs the > build to add the missing configure option. Binary distros can indeed > get away without it being a

Re: [E-devel] efl tree

2012-10-14 Thread Ralph Sennhauser
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:37:11 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > So again: Either force-disable/force-enable a feature or allow > > configure switches for it, automagic just causes more confusion and > > more work for packagers and users. > > more for packagers. less for users. u