On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:49:46 +0100 Davide Andreoli
wrote:
> 2013/3/14 Kai Huuhko
>
> > 14.03.2013 05:02, Doug Newgard kirjoitti:
> > >
> > >> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:52:12 +0900
> > >> From: [email protected]
> > >> To: [email protected]
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Spank, this breaks clouseau_client (and probably other things as well).
>
> 64 bit, just run: "clouseau_client"
Do you have any backtrace or valuable valgrind here ? I don't have a
64bits system until Sunday... and only for Sunday.
--
Cedric
If you use no DM (like xdm /gdm and the rest) you most likely only
need a simple entry to your .xinitrc file (which should already have
one for jwm, just comment that out and add the equivalent one for
Enlightenment).
it should be a line like "exec $PREFIX/enlightenment_start"
with $PREFIX being
2013/3/14 Kai Huuhko
> 14.03.2013 05:02, Doug Newgard kirjoitti:
> >
> >> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:52:12 +0900
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [E-devel] [econnman] [patch] update for new
Hey Cedric,
please take a look with clang and fix.
Core was generated by
`/home/likewise-open/SERILOCAL/d.willmann/scm/core/efl/src/bin/edje/.libs/lt-edj'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 __memmove_ssse3_back () at
../sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memcpy-ssse3-back.S:1555
1
Spank, this breaks clouseau_client (and probably other things as well).
64 bit, just run: "clouseau_client"
Cheers,
Tom.
Original Message
Subject:edje: reduce memory usage of Edje signal callbacks and
automates.
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 07:46:42 GMT
From: Cedric BAI
Hmm, yes :-)))
On 03/14/2013 05:26 PM, Daniel Willmann wrote:
> On 14/03/13 11:55, Daniel Zaoui - Enlightenment Git wrote:
>> jackdanielz pushed a commit to branch eo_id.
> I'm sure this should have been devs/jackdanielz/eo_id
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
> -
On 14/03/13 15:26, Daniel Willmann wrote:
> On 14/03/13 11:55, Daniel Zaoui - Enlightenment Git wrote:
>> jackdanielz pushed a commit to branch eo_id.
>
> I'm sure this should have been devs/jackdanielz/eo_id
Yep, already fixed. Deleted that branch, added back the restrictions and
spanked him.
-
On 14/03/13 11:55, Daniel Zaoui - Enlightenment Git wrote:
> jackdanielz pushed a commit to branch eo_id.
I'm sure this should have been devs/jackdanielz/eo_id
Regards,
Daniel
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
M
On 14/03/13 09:49, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> https://phab.enlightenment.org/phame/live/1/post/enlightenment_and_efl_backing_wayland/
>
> ---
>
> Enlightenment is backing Wayland for our future display system, and for now
> has
> no plans concerning Mir.
>
> There has been a lot of
Saulo Moraes, il 14/03/2013 14:00, ha scritto:
> After the make and make install any
> "enligtenment.desktop" is created?
yes
> Where?
in $PREFIX/share/xsessions
--
Massimo Maiurana GPG keyID #7044D601
La fede e' credere in cio' che sai non essere vero
14.03.2013 05:02, Doug Newgard kirjoitti:
>
>> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:52:12 +0900
>> From: [email protected]
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [E-devel] [econnman] [patch] update for new bindings
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013
Hi,
I have successful compiled Enlightenment code from git repo following
instructions from http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Installation ... but now
I need to config my Xorg to start Enlightenment instead of jwm, I dont have
Display Manager installed (like xdm..).
So my question is: The
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:10:28 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:05:23 +0900 Cedric BAIL
> said:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 PM, David Seikel
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:00:14 +0900 Cedric BAIL
> > > wrote:
> > >> As some people may have n
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:05:23 +0900 Cedric BAIL
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 PM, David Seikel
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:00:14 +0900 Cedric BAIL
> > wrote:
> >> As some people may have noted I have been looking at memory issue
> >> for a month or so. We are now almost back to w
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 21:05:23 +0900 Cedric BAIL said:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 PM, David Seikel wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:00:14 +0900 Cedric BAIL
> > wrote:
> >> As some people may have noted I have been looking at memory issue for
> >> a month or so. We are now almost back to wher
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:48 PM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:00:14 +0900 Cedric BAIL
> wrote:
>> As some people may have noted I have been looking at memory issue for
>> a month or so. We are now almost back to where we were with 1.7 with
>> more feature. I am looking forward to
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 20:00:14 +0900 Cedric BAIL
wrote:
> Hello every one,
>
> As some people may have noted I have been looking at memory issue for
> a month or so. We are now almost back to where we were with 1.7 with
> more feature. I am looking forward to Eo static array callbacks to
> push th
Hello every one,
As some people may have noted I have been looking at memory issue for
a month or so. We are now almost back to where we were with 1.7 with
more feature. I am looking forward to Eo static array callbacks to
push that down even more and maybe be bellow 1.7. Except that, there
is sti
On 14/03/13 07:42, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't get mails from this list, and I haven't for a few weeks; the
> so-called git^Wsvn elimination team has been notified of this repeatedly.
> This is pretty crippling in terms of being able to know what's going on and
> review incoming c
it seems that your administrative powers have fixed the issue. thanks
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Daniel Willmann wrote:
> On 14/03/13 07:42, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > I don't get mails from this list, and I haven't for a few weeks; the
> > so-called git^Wsvn elimination team has been
https://phab.enlightenment.org/phame/live/1/post/enlightenment_and_efl_backing_wayland/
---
Enlightenment is backing Wayland for our future display system, and for now has
no plans concerning Mir.
There has been a lot of kerfuffle about Ubuntu's new effort to make Mir, their
new display server.
On 14/03/13 07:42, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> I don't get mails from this list, and I haven't for a few weeks; the
> so-called git^Wsvn elimination team has been notified of this repeatedly.
> This is pretty crippling in terms of being able to know what's going on
> and
> review incoming code, s
Am 14.03.2013 um 08:42 schrieb Michael Blumenkrantz
:
> Hi,
>
> I don't get mails from this list, and I haven't for a few weeks; the
> so-called git^Wsvn elimination team has been notified of this repeatedly.
> This is pretty crippling in terms of being able to know what's going on and
> review
Hi,
I don't get mails from this list, and I haven't for a few weeks; the
so-called git^Wsvn elimination team has been notified of this repeatedly.
This is pretty crippling in terms of being able to know what's going on and
review incoming code, so it would be nice to know what steps are being
take
he managed to do something useful with efx even before I added the edje
api...I second.
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Mar 2013 15:52:16 +0100 Laurent Ghigonis
> said:
>
> i have to say that is rather cool/neat. :) and onefang.. this isnt the
> graphing
> u
26 matches
Mail list logo
