2013/3/19 Michael Blumenkrantz
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 21:51:18 +0200
> Kai Huuhko wrote:
>
> > 19.03.2013 19:38, Lucas De Marchi kirjoitti:
> > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Kai Huuhko
> wrote:
> > >> 19.03.2013 16:01, Lucas De Marchi kirjoitti:
> > >>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Kai
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:09:49 + Daniel Willmann
wrote:
> On 19/03/13 17:43, Daniel Willmann wrote:
> > All was fine until earlier today when the Jenkins bot got kicked
> > from #edevelop for use of colors and excessive messaging. I
> > disabled colors and reduced the message to only report suc
On 19/03/13 17:43, Daniel Willmann wrote:
> All was fine until earlier today when the Jenkins bot got kicked from
> #edevelop for use of colors and excessive messaging. I disabled colors
> and reduced the message to only report success of failure in order to
> have the bot in the channel again.
[.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Mike McCormack wrote:
> On 03/21/2013 01:28 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>
>> And for those of you to insist in disagreeing, go complaint to GCC devs now:
>>
>> http://lwn.net/Articles/542920/
>> " In addition, -pedantic has been deprecated (in favor of -Wpedantic),
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:15:19 +1100 Mike McCormack said:
>
> > On 03/21/2013 01:28 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> >
> > > And for those of you to insist in disagreeing, go complaint to GCC
> devs now:
> > >
> > > http://lwn.net/Articles/542
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Bruno Dilly wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> Let's put some goal for the coming release of EFL 1.8. It is clearly
>> not yet ready for a release and I know that we have still a few
>> features we want to push in. I would say that
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:15:19 +1100 Mike McCormack said:
> On 03/21/2013 01:28 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>
> > And for those of you to insist in disagreeing, go complaint to GCC devs now:
> >
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/542920/
> > " In addition, -pedantic has been deprecated (in favor of -Wpeda
On 19/03/13 04:15, ravenlock wrote:
> On 3/10/13 4:43 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>> Hello all, GSoC submission will start in 8 days and will be finished in 19
>> days.
>>
>> https://www.google.com/calendar/render?eid=cHVmaXBodWhnMWIzc2h0OWNndnRlYjkzOGsgZ3N1bW1lcm9mY29kZUBt&ctz=America/Los_Angele
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:15 PM, ravenlock wrote:
>> On 3/10/13 4:43 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>>> Hello all, GSoC submission will start in 8 days and will be finished in 19
>>> days.
>>>
>>> https://www.google.com/calendar/render?eid=cHVm
On 03/21/13 11:07, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 21/03/13 11:00, Mike McCormack wrote:
> > On 03/21/2013 09:25 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >
> >> Silencing warnings just for silencing is not good. We use them to spot
> >> bugs, that's why we like them so much. Silencing useful warnings is
> >> count
On 21/03/13 12:05, David Seikel wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:37:53 + Tom Hacohen
> wrote:
>
>> On 21/03/13 11:22, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Tom Hacohen
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 21/03/13 11:00, Mike McCormack wrote:
> On 03/21/2013 09:25 PM, Tom Haco
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:37:53 + Tom Hacohen
wrote:
> On 21/03/13 11:22, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Tom Hacohen
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 21/03/13 11:00, Mike McCormack wrote:
> >>> On 03/21/2013 09:25 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >>>
> Silencing warnings ju
On 21/03/13 11:22, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> pretty sure neither of the cases were "blindly silencing warnings".
>
> one of the changes made was to use the correct free function, preventing a
> magic failure and a leak.
> another was to add a format string and prevent undefined behavior with
On 21/03/13 11:22, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
>> On 21/03/13 11:00, Mike McCormack wrote:
>>> On 03/21/2013 09:25 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>>
Silencing warnings just for silencing is not good. We use them to spot
bugs, that's why we
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 21/03/13 11:00, Mike McCormack wrote:
> > On 03/21/2013 09:25 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >
> >> Silencing warnings just for silencing is not good. We use them to spot
> >> bugs, that's why we like them so much. Silencing useful warnings is
>
On 21/03/13 11:00, Mike McCormack wrote:
> On 03/21/2013 09:25 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
>> Silencing warnings just for silencing is not good. We use them to spot
>> bugs, that's why we like them so much. Silencing useful warnings is
>> counter-productive.
>
> Usually a developer, upon checking out
On 21/03/13 11:00, Mike McCormack wrote:
> On 03/21/2013 09:25 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
>> Silencing warnings just for silencing is not good. We use them to spot
>> bugs, that's why we like them so much. Silencing useful warnings is
>> counter-productive.
>
> Usually a developer, upon checking out
On 03/21/2013 09:25 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Silencing warnings just for silencing is not good. We use them to spot
> bugs, that's why we like them so much. Silencing useful warnings is
> counter-productive.
Usually a developer, upon checking out a code base and building it on
their system and o
Dear Cedric,
Well said.
Silencing warnings just for silencing is not good. We use them to spot
bugs, that's why we like them so much. Silencing useful warnings is
counter-productive.
--
Tom.
On 21/03/13 01:12, Cedric BAIL - Enlightenment Git wrote:
> cedric pushed a commit to branch master.
>
On 03/21/2013 01:28 PM, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> And for those of you to insist in disagreeing, go complaint to GCC devs now:
>
> http://lwn.net/Articles/542920/
> " In addition, -pedantic has been deprecated (in favor of -Wpedantic),
> and -Wshadow has been fixed. -Wshadow now permits a common us
20 matches
Mail list logo
