Thank you for porting this !! :)
Cheers,
dh
On 23/07/13 02:29, Sung W. Park - Enlightenment Git wrote:
sung pushed a commit to branch master.
commit 7aa516c01a620da3438de864ac0c0e5b80c93d0b
Author: Sung W. Park dunamis.p...@samsung.com
Date: Tue Jul 23 10:23:36 2013 +0900
Evas:
No problem. :)
I was worried that I would break something since I couldn't compile it but
it was simple a simple addition so I just went ahead with it.
For big ones, I'll let you know. :)
cheers,
Sung
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Christopher Michael cp.mich...@samsung.com
wrote:
Thank
On 23/07/13 07:17, Sung W. Park wrote:
No problem. :)
I was worried that I would break something since I couldn't compile it but
it was simple a simple addition so I just went ahead with it.
No Worries :) Ideally I would request at Least a compile check ;) (let's
not pick up any bad habits
Hello,
As the time comes, we are trying to move to a time based release. But
as the discussion on Eo does show, it takes time to reach a consensus
on some API and make it difficult to move forward on a release.
So I have introduced a macro EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT that is used to
disable API that we
I don't understand why we can't just remove all those from the public
headers. If we're still rewriting them so much that they need to be marked
as beta, they should not be released at all imo.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr wrote:
Hello,
As the time comes,
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand why we can't just remove all those from the public
headers. If we're still rewriting them so much that they need to be marked
as beta, they should not be released at all imo.
Because
sure, but it sounds more like pre-alpha than beta at this point
considering the amount of rewrite occurring.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com wrote:
sure, but it sounds more like pre-alpha than beta at this point
considering the amount of rewrite occurring.
There is still no agreement about if we are going to change any of the
existing API or not. It
On 22/07/13 18:42, ChunEon Park wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOdgBBV4J3sfeature=youtu.be
Hm.. syntax highlighting - nice.
Looks like you have a nice syntax highlighting, line numbering and etc.
going on there, what did you use?
Really nice, and I see the source as in your private
Hey,
From the setlocale man page:
If locale is NULL, the current locale is only queried, not modified.
I am only querying it there, not modifying it. It's up to the
application to set the locale to whatever it wants, for example by
calling setlocale with like you've suggested.
This is
On 23/07/13 08:46, Cedric BAIL wrote:
Hello,
As the time comes, we are trying to move to a time based release. But
as the discussion on Eo does show, it takes time to reach a consensus
on some API and make it difficult to move forward on a release.
So I have introduced a macro
just an entry. :-)
still have many stuff to do with entry before first release.
1. auto indentation.
2. undo/redo.
3. fix the entry object maximum size problem.
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: Tom Hacohentom.haco...@samsung.com
To:
On 23/07/13 11:43, ChunEon Park wrote:
just an entry. :-)
still have many stuff to do with entry before first release.
1. auto indentation.
2. undo/redo.
3. fix the entry object maximum size problem.
Cool. :)
--
Tom.
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:07:30 +0900 Sung W. Park sung...@gmail.com said:
Looks really nice hermet! :)
what's wrong with 'enventor'??? it totally makes sense you know, like all
the other names. i'm surprised that terminology wasn't name eterminology
;-)
espion, evas, edje, eet, ecore,
Hello everyone,
If this lands, https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/e18_with_systemd_user_session/
should be updated.
--
Leif
Am Samstag, 20. Juli 2013 um 16:50 schrieb Thomas Gstädtner:
This has a few advantages over the current approach:
- only depends on user-session-units, not the
On 12/07/13 07:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com said:
ok. looked at eo2test.c
eo2_do(obj,
a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
inst_func(eo_o, 10);
b = inst_func(eo_o, 50);
);
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
On 12/07/13 07:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com
said:
ok. looked at eo2test.c
eo2_do(obj,
a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
On 23/07/13 02:51, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:30:17 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com said:
On 21/07/13 14:18, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten
On Tuesday 23 July 2013 15:47, Tom Hacohen wrote :
On 12/07/13 07:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com
said:
ok. looked at eo2test.c
eo2_do(obj,
a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
just to clarify a few points:
- I think the less macro we have in an eo class declaration the best,
actually we have nothing but that extra first parameter called eo2_o, wich
is either an obj_ptr (devs/tasn/eo2) or a call_ctx (devs/jeyzu/eo2)
this should go away if we use a stack per
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Leif Middelschulte
leif.middelschu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
If this lands,
https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/e18_with_systemd_user_session/ should be
updated.
--
Leif
I will do that once it is in. I talked to Cedric already and am
waiting
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:07:30 +0900 Sung W. Park sung...@gmail.com said:
Looks really nice hermet! :)
what's wrong with 'enventor'??? it totally makes sense you know, like all
the other names. i'm surprised that
Inventor is simple and intutive word but doesn't impact on people (at least
on me.)
Enventor sounds something different and sounds as if it's a special one.
I like Enventor than Inventor.
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From:
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch said:
just to clarify a few points:
- I think the less macro we have in an eo class declaration the best,
actually we have nothing but that extra first parameter called eo2_o, wich
is either an obj_ptr (devs/tasn/eo2) or
I reviewed the code right before and found that was incorrect.
Fixed. commit 9560669f925cfd875c80cc212b32c6d1499d0e78
Thanks you for catching it. :)
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: daniel.za...@samsung.comdaniel.zaoui@samsung.com
To:
25 matches
Mail list logo
