On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 00:46:25 + Felipe Magno de Almeida
said:
> Hello,
>
> There's a deadlock in eina_stringshare_del/eina_share_common_del
> because the function eina_share_common_del locks _mutex_big, but it
> then goes to call eina_share_common_population_del which also tries to
> lock _mut
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 09:38:45 +0200 Mark-Willem Jansen
said:
>
>
> > Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 21:42:59 +0900
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> > CC: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [E-devel] Fw: Enlightenment presentation? (ping #2)
> >
> > O
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 16:24:35 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 06/09/13 16:22, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:34:17 +0100 Tom Hacohen
> > said:
> >
> >> On 06/09/13 14:02, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:25:24 +0100 Tom Hacohen
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 19:16:38 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Iván Briano wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >> On 05/09/13 17:42, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Why eo_del() doesn't flag the object as
Hello,
There's a deadlock in eina_stringshare_del/eina_share_common_del
because the function eina_share_common_del locks _mutex_big, but it
then goes to call eina_share_common_population_del which also tries to
lock _mutex_big.
Regards,
--
Felipe Magno de Almeida
---
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Jose Souza wrote:
> I just push elm_app_server/client classes in elementary and the
> implementation of they in terminology.
>
> http://git.enlightenment.org/core/elementary.git/log/?h=devs/zehortigoza/app_spec_impl
>
> http://git.enlightenment.org/apps/terminology.
I have minion too!!
Cedric Bail
On Sep 6, 2013 11:24 PM, "Tom Hacohen" wrote:
> On 06/09/13 15:21, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:17:18 +0100
> > Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/09/13 14:20, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >>> On 06/09/13 14:17, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Iván Briano wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 05/09/13 17:42, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Why eo_del() doesn't flag the object as deleted and issue an event callback?
>>
>> Because the object might still be re
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Jose Souza wrote:
>> I just push elm_app_server/client classes in elementary and the
>> implementation of they in terminology.
>>
>> http://git.enlightenment.org/core/elementary.git/log/?h=devs/zehor
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Davide Andreoli wrote:
> 2013/9/6 Tom Hacohen
>
>> On 05/09/13 17:42, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Why eo_del() doesn't flag the object as deleted and issue an event
>> callback?
>>
>> Because the object might still be referenced. It could
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:42:28 -0700
José Roberto de Souza - Enlightenment Git wrote:
> zehortigoza pushed a commit to branch master.
>
> commit b140380776b758d3d8c1682896787e4b5291fd5a
> Author: José Roberto de Souza
> Date: Fri Sep 6 17:41:24 2013 -0300
>
> Avoid crash when socket addres
2013/9/6 Tom Hacohen
> On 05/09/13 17:42, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Why eo_del() doesn't flag the object as deleted and issue an event
> callback?
>
> Because the object might still be referenced. It could be done though,
> we haven't decided one way or the other, this m
I just push elm_app_server/client classes in elementary and the
implementation of they in terminology.
http://git.enlightenment.org/core/elementary.git/log/?h=devs/zehortigoza/app_spec_impl
http://git.enlightenment.org/apps/terminology.git/log/?h=devs/zehortigoza/app_spec_impl
On Mon, Aug 26, 2
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman), il 06/09/2013 02:26, ha scritto:
> On Thu, 05 Sep 2013 17:07:51 +0200 Massimo Maiurana said:
>
>> Massimo Maiurana, il 04/08/2013 11:12, ha scritto:
>>
>>> - at some point, after an update of my debian jessie, the openGL engine
>>> stopped working. When I activat
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:34:17 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 06/09/13 14:02, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:25:24 +0100 Tom Hacohen
> > said:
> >
> >> On 03/09/13 22:25, Côme BERNIGAUD wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I saw that there is a new component named EO i
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 05/09/13 17:42, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Why eo_del() doesn't flag the object as deleted and issue an event callback?
>
> Because the object might still be referenced. It could be done though,
> we haven't decided one
On 06/09/13 16:22, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:34:17 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
>> On 06/09/13 14:02, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:25:24 +0100 Tom Hacohen
>>> said:
>>>
On 03/09/13 22:25, Côme BERNIGAUD wrote:
> He
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:17:18 +0100
Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 06/09/13 14:20, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > On 06/09/13 14:17, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> >> he was the one who broke it in the first place, so he's still a borker
> >> hero at best
> >>
> >
> > I guess, I wasn't clear in my previous email
On 06/09/13 14:20, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 06/09/13 14:17, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>> he was the one who broke it in the first place, so he's still a borker hero
>> at best
>>
>
> I guess, I wasn't clear in my previous email, I didn't mean to strip
> Cedric off his borker titles and pride.
>
>
On 06/09/13 15:21, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:17:18 +0100
> Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
>> On 06/09/13 14:20, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> On 06/09/13 14:17, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
he was the one who broke it in the first place, so he's still a borker
hero at best
On 06/09/13 14:02, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:25:24 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
>
>> On 03/09/13 22:25, Côme BERNIGAUD wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I saw that there is a new component named EO in the EFLs.
>>> EO is already a library, it stands for «Evolving Objects»
On 06/09/13 14:17, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> he was the one who broke it in the first place, so he's still a borker hero
> at best
>
I guess, I wasn't clear in my previous email, I didn't mean to strip
Cedric off his borker titles and pride.
Cedric, you are a borker, and a borker you will a
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:15:10 +0100
Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 06/09/13 14:12, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:07:58 +0100
> > Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >
> >> I had an annoying bug, that was supposedly related to map (according to
> >> Mike), and I assumed this was the cause, as i
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:15:10 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 06/09/13 14:12, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:07:58 +0100
> > Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >
> >> I had an annoying bug, that was supposedly related to map (according to
> >> Mike), and I assumed this was the cause, as it
On 06/09/13 14:12, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:07:58 +0100
> Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
>> I had an annoying bug, that was supposedly related to map (according to
>> Mike), and I assumed this was the cause, as it was fixed in the last 2 days.
>>
>> I had an issues with the pager
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 14:07:58 +0100
Tom Hacohen wrote:
> I had an annoying bug, that was supposedly related to map (according to
> Mike), and I assumed this was the cause, as it was fixed in the last 2 days.
>
> I had an issues with the pager in e when switching among empty desktops
> (with the
I had an annoying bug, that was supposedly related to map (according to
Mike), and I assumed this was the cause, as it was fixed in the last 2 days.
I had an issues with the pager in e when switching among empty desktops
(with the next/prev key-bindings). The selected desktop in the pager
would
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:50:14 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
what bug? you saw it? where?
> Thanks! Was a very annoying bug.
>
> --
> Tom.
>
> On 05/09/13 12:31, Carsten Haitzler - Enlightenment Git (Rasterman) wrote:
> > raster pushed a commit to branch master.
> >
> > commit 3f94953509f85588dd7cfeea
On Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:25:24 +0100 Tom Hacohen said:
> On 03/09/13 22:25, Côme BERNIGAUD wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I saw that there is a new component named EO in the EFLs.
> > EO is already a library, it stands for «Evolving Objects» :
> > http://eodev.sourceforge.net/
> >
> > This is causing tr
Thanks! Was a very annoying bug.
--
Tom.
On 05/09/13 12:31, Carsten Haitzler - Enlightenment Git (Rasterman) wrote:
> raster pushed a commit to branch master.
>
> commit 3f94953509f85588dd7cfeea72280379621dc5fc
> Author: Carsten Haitzler (Rasterman)
> Date: Thu Sep 5 20:30:51 2013 +0900
>
>
On 05/09/13 17:42, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Why eo_del() doesn't flag the object as deleted and issue an event callback?
Because the object might still be referenced. It could be done though,
we haven't decided one way or the other, this might be a reasonable
approach as wel
On 03/09/13 22:25, Côme BERNIGAUD wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I saw that there is a new component named EO in the EFLs.
> EO is already a library, it stands for «Evolving Objects» :
> http://eodev.sourceforge.net/
>
> This is causing trouble, at least for one file:
> /usr/lib/pkgconfig/eo.pc is the pkgconf
On 09/05/13 17:53, Rafael Antognolli wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Chris Michael wrote:
>> On 09/04/13 19:13, Rafael Antognolli wrote:
>>> Hi dh,
>>>
>>> Is this done because of the "black spacer" that you mention in Ecore's
>>> commit? If so, that's fixed there already, do we still ne
33 matches
Mail list logo
