On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:37:10 + Andrew Williams said:
Looks good, but I think it's too trimmed. Maybe it's just that in every
language I know a method, function, etc. also lists its inputs and outputs
(return and argument names/types). and not having that there even in shorthand
makes it harde
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 13:11:53 +0900 Jean-Philippe André said:
> Hi,
>
>
> Just a word about panes and other new widgets: yes they got broken at some
> point but should be fixed now that the "EO" theme API has been merged.
> I think most of the existing Efl.Ui.Xxx widgets should soon become usabl
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:31 AM, Andrew Williams
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Perfect, that's the site updated to only include Efl.* (and eina.* as I
> realised there are some objects aliased).
>
> However this highlights an issue - the Efl.Ui widgets (or at least most of
> them) inherit from Elm.Widget and
On 12/11/2017 06:03 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
cedric pushed a commit to branch master.
http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=6e446c64d60b538c2e63aab94a92debe8e8907fe
commit 6e446c64d60b538c2e63aab94a92debe8e8907fe
Author: Cedric BAIL
Date: Mon Dec 11 14:56:37 2017 -0800
elem
Hi,
I have done some significant updates to the new API docs. The layout still
wants a little tweaking but they should be more readable than they were
before. I've trimmed the fat out of all inherited members as discussed
before.
The result is that a page like
www.enlightenment.org/develop/api/ef
Hi,
Perfect, that's the site updated to only include Efl.* (and eina.* as I
realised there are some objects aliased).
However this highlights an issue - the Efl.Ui widgets (or at least most of
them) inherit from Elm.Widget and so their parent is no longer in the docs.
The contents of Elm.Widget i
Hi,
That's great, thanks very much.
Andy
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 at 06:22 Amitesh Singh wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Jean-Philippe André
> wrote:
>
> > Amitesh, please fix it!
> >
> >
> Sungtaek has fixed it. :)
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Andrew Williams
> > wrote:
> >
>
