On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:42 AM, Jean-Philippe André
wrote:
> 2017-10-27 11:12 GMT+09:00 Amitesh Singh :
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <
> > barbi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Amitesh Singh <
> amitesh...@sa
2017-10-27 11:12 GMT+09:00 Amitesh Singh :
> Hello,
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <
> barbi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Amitesh Singh
> > wrote:
> >
> > thanks for the improvement, but one hint I said before went unnoticed
> > and
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <
barbi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Amitesh Singh
> wrote:
>
> thanks for the improvement, but one hint I said before went unnoticed
> and would save great deal of this implementation:
>
>
> > +typedef
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Amitesh Singh wrote:
thanks for the improvement, but one hint I said before went unnoticed
and would save great deal of this implementation:
> +typedef struct
> +{
> + const char *template;
> +} Efl_Ui_Format_Data;
this is already stored in the object, due f