On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 14:11:29 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:19:17 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com said:
Thankfully, it seems you didn't end up pushing your revert back upstream
and the issue is now resolved.
On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:01:16 -0400 Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com said:
On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 14:11:29 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:19:17 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com said:
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 17:30:43 -0700 Mike Blumenkrantz zm...@osg.samsung.com
said:
sorry - i had to revert this due to a pretty bad behavior bug this commit
introduced. see my commit log in the revert. i pinged you on irc (zmike) but no
response, so i've had to do this to at least keep e working
Thankfully, it seems you didn't end up pushing your revert back upstream
and the issue is now resolved.
It would be great if we could step back from this instant revert culture
that has been created since the move to git. Just because it can be done
doesn't mean that it should; it's a very
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:19:17 -0400 Mike Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com said:
Thankfully, it seems you didn't end up pushing your revert back upstream
and the issue is now resolved.
ummm... oh crap. you're right. oops. i didn't push.
It would be great if we could step back from
