On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Eduardo Felipe
eduardofelip...@gmail.com wrote:
I would appreciate if I'm mentioned as the author of the patch and the
commit message is preserved.
This is the third time a
Folks,
Mac OS X does not provide an implementation of clock_gettime() even
though it's POSIX, but it does provide a fast high-resolution
monotonic clock through mach specific APIs that are perfectly suited
for usage in ecore_timer.
Without this patch ecore_timer throws a critical warning on Mac
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Eduardo Felipe wrote:
Folks,
Mac OS X does not provide an implementation of clock_gettime() even
though it's POSIX, but it does provide a fast high-resolution
monotonic clock through mach specific APIs that are perfectly suited
for usage in ecore_timer.
Without this
I would appreciate if I'm mentioned as the author of the patch and the
commit message is preserved.
This is the third time a patch of mine is accepted without
attribution, and I think it shows a lack of care for input from users.
Eduardo.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Vincent Torri
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Eduardo Felipe wrote:
I would appreciate if I'm mentioned as the author of the patch and the
commit message is preserved.
This is the third time a patch of mine is accepted without
attribution, and I think it shows a lack of care for input from users.
what I can do is
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Eduardo Felipe wrote:
I would appreciate if I'm mentioned as the author of the patch and the
commit message is preserved.
This is the third time a patch of mine is accepted without
attribution, and I think it shows a lack of
Reverting is dangerous. I guess should have written the changes to the
Changelog myself. Should I write it now or would you do it for me?
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Eduardo Felipe
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Eduardo Felipe wrote:
Reverting is dangerous. I guess should have written the changes to the
Changelog myself. Should I write it now or would you do it for me?
do it, so that you'll put exactly what you want.
Vincent
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Vincent Torri
So here is the patch for the ChangeLog.
Thanks,
Eduardo Felipe.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Eduardo Felipe wrote:
Reverting is dangerous. I guess should have written the changes to the
Changelog myself. Should I write it
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Eduardo Felipe wrote:
So here is the patch for the ChangeLog.
Thanks,
done, sorry for not mentioning you
Vincent
Eduardo Felipe.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Eduardo Felipe wrote:
Reverting is
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Eduardo Felipe
eduardofelip...@gmail.com wrote:
I would appreciate if I'm mentioned as the author of the patch and the
commit message is preserved.
This is the third time a patch of mine is accepted without
attribution, and I think it shows a lack of care for
11 matches
Mail list logo
