On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:29:48 +0530 Vikram Narayanan vikram...@gmail.com said:
On 3/21/2012 3:28 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 15:16:49 +0530 Vikram Narayananvikram...@gmail.com
said:
As the width and height are defined as static, no need to initialize it
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 15:16:49 +0530 Vikram Narayanan vikram...@gmail.com said:
As the width and height are defined as static, no need to initialize it
again to zero. Also removed checks for 'valid pointers' as it is redundant.
question... why did you make these changes? did you get warnings or
On 3/21/2012 3:28 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sat, 17 Mar 2012 15:16:49 +0530 Vikram Narayananvikram...@gmail.com
said:
As the width and height are defined as static, no need to initialize it
again to zero. Also removed checks for 'valid pointers' as it is redundant.
