On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 08:28:56 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
At Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:16:54 -0300,
Lucas De Marchi wrote:
This is EAPI! I
At Fri, 8 Oct 2010 21:37:50 +0900,
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 08:28:56 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:20 AM, Vincent Torri vto...@univ-evry.fr wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Raphael Kubo da Costa
In practice, it was already being treated as an Eina_Bool, so let us
declare it as such and simplify the code.
---
src/lib/ecore_con/Ecore_Con.h |2 +-
src/lib/ecore_con/ecore_con_url.c | 10 ++
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hi, Kubo
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa
k...@profusion.mobi wrote:
In practice, it was already being treated as an Eina_Bool, so let us
declare it as such and simplify the code.
---
src/lib/ecore_con/Ecore_Con.h | 2 +-
src/lib/ecore_con/ecore_con_url.c | 10
At Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:16:54 -0300,
Lucas De Marchi wrote:
This is EAPI! I little bit late to change this I think.
I have to admit I haven't paid attention to the discussions about API
breakage near 1.0 as closely as I should have.
Does it mean it should be kept like this until 2.0 comes out?
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
At Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:16:54 -0300,
Lucas De Marchi wrote:
This is EAPI! I little bit late to change this I think.
I have to admit I haven't paid attention to the discussions about API
breakage near 1.0 as closely as I should have.
Does it
