Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-26 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:28:30 -0700 Cedric BAIL said: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > > > why are you doing a symlink if its JUST a quicklaunch binary change (that > > statically compiles all of efl into it)? > > As

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-26 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:39:47 +1030 Simon Lees said: > > > On 10/27/2016 04:58 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Carsten Haitzler > > wrote: > >> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:32:29 -0700 Cedric BAIL said: > >>> On

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-26 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:14:05 +0200 Vincent Torri said: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 04:50:54 +0200 Vincent Torri > > said: > > > >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:17 AM,

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-26 Thread Simon Lees
On 10/27/2016 04:58 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:32:29 -0700 Cedric BAIL said: >>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Carsten Haitzler >>> wrote:

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-26 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Vincent Torri >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Carsten Haitzler

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-26 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: >> On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:32:29 -0700 Cedric BAIL said: >>> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Carsten Haitzler

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-26 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Vincent Torri > wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Carsten Haitzler >> wrote: >>> On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 04:50:54 +0200 Vincent

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-26 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:32:29 -0700 Cedric BAIL said: >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Carsten Haitzler >> wrote: >> > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:14:20 -0700 Cedric BAIL

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-26 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: >> On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 04:50:54 +0200 Vincent Torri >> said: >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Carsten

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-25 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 04:50:54 +0200 Vincent Torri > said: > >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Carsten Haitzler >> wrote: >> > On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:32:29 -0700

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-25 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 04:50:54 +0200 Vincent Torri said: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:32:29 -0700 Cedric BAIL said: > > > >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Carsten

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-25 Thread Vincent Torri
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:32:29 -0700 Cedric BAIL said: > >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Carsten Haitzler >> wrote: >> > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:14:20 -0700 Cedric BAIL

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-25 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:32:29 -0700 Cedric BAIL said: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:14:20 -0700 Cedric BAIL said: > > > > i've been mulling this. i followed the feedback so

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-25 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:14:20 -0700 Cedric BAIL said: > > i've been mulling this. i followed the feedback so far. basically 2 main > things: > > 1. this is intended to improve performance.

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-24 Thread The Rasterman
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:14:20 -0700 Cedric BAIL said: i've been mulling this. i followed the feedback so far. basically 2 main things: 1. this is intended to improve performance. especially startup times. 2. this is highly problematic in terms of portability and is going to

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-24 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > On 22/10/16 00:53, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Stefan Schmidt >> wrote: >>> On 22/10/16 00:14, Cedric BAIL wrote: Before I embark on a crazy idea

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-24 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On 22/10/16 00:53, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Stefan Schmidt > wrote: >> On 22/10/16 00:14, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>> Before I embark on a crazy idea that may just break everything, I >>> would like to get some feedback. So one of the

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-23 Thread Simon Lees
On 10/22/2016 09:23 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Stefan Schmidt > wrote: >> On 22/10/16 00:14, Cedric BAIL wrote: >>> Before I embark on a crazy idea that may just break everything, I >>> would like to get some feedback. So one of the

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-21 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > On 22/10/16 00:14, Cedric BAIL wrote: >> Before I embark on a crazy idea that may just break everything, I >> would like to get some feedback. So one of the problem we are facing >> with EFL is that with all those

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-21 Thread Al Poole
I don't know how portable that would be??? I don't think /proc is available by default on most non-Linux Unix-like OS I use... On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > On 22/10/16 00:14, Cedric BAIL wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Before I embark on

Re: [E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-21 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On 22/10/16 00:14, Cedric BAIL wrote: > Hello, > > Before I embark on a crazy idea that may just break everything, I > would like to get some feedback. So one of the problem we are facing > with EFL is that with all those separated library we end up with some > serious time during

[E-devel] [RFC] One binary to rule them all, packagers opinion needed

2016-10-21 Thread Cedric BAIL
Hello, Before I embark on a crazy idea that may just break everything, I would like to get some feedback. So one of the problem we are facing with EFL is that with all those separated library we end up with some serious time during application startup dedicated to linking. A work around has been