Having it handled by CVS instead of a webgui-CMS doesn't mean to have no CMS
at all.
There are some CM-systems out there that can create the content out of
simple text files with a simple markup language.
This would allow to keep the CVS structure and have people to write articles
without having
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:18:23 -0500 Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
i agree here. i like our fairly flat (and lax) access structure. if we trust
you to go writing bits of e.org's website - we trust you to write code - if
that is your skill, or to just know to keep your hands off what
We've tried this about 3 times. Someone comes along and says if we
have a CMS non-technical people will write articles. We implement a
CMS. No-one writes articles. We drop the CMS.
If you want to write news releases put them on blogs. Or write a news
blurb for the front page. If longer
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 8:58 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've tried this about 3 times. Someone comes along and says if we
have a CMS non-technical people will write articles. We implement a
CMS. No-one writes articles. We drop the CMS.
If you want to write news releases put
While drunk at the moment (yet again) i think i would contribute to
any user controlled content as would a lot of people. (while not drunk
of course.) People semi-excited about the project would like to show
their support too. And thats the great thing about OSS I believe that
the community gets a
I'm not saying having a CMS will suddenly bring people to write.
That's a separate problem.
I think it will not BLOCK people from writing. There's a difference.
There are various avenues we can pursue to attract writers.
Bounties, request for articles on the front page, etc can easily
attract
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 02:26:57 +0800 Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
While drunk at the moment (yet again) i think i would contribute to
any user controlled content as would a lot of people. (while not drunk
of course.) People semi-excited about the project would like to show
their support too.
On 2-Aug-08, at 2:55 PM, Sthithaprajna Garapaty wrote:
I'm not saying having a CMS will suddenly bring people to write.
That's a separate problem.
I think it will not BLOCK people from writing. There's a difference.
There are various avenues we can pursue to attract writers.
Bounties,
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:46:01 -0700 Ian Caldwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
So now it is your chance to tell us why we should be using a specific cms
verses the alternative of just making our own specific to our needs and
keeping it minimalistic. Please give the pros and the cons and explorer
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 5:27 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so eventually went back to an old original method. www lives in cvs - u want
to
work on it, u get cvs access. committing means it auto-updates. if u need to
test the php locally setting up a local apache
10 matches
Mail list logo