Re: [E-devel] [patch] ecore_list2 removal

2006-01-06 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 16:33:51 -0500 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Monday, 02 January 2006, at 12:46:32 (-0600), > Nathan Ingersoll wrote: > > > I don't think there is a very cohesive plan on list use atm. I've > > heard a few rumblings of people saying "ecore lists suck" or "ev

Re: [E-devel] [patch] ecore_list2 removal

2006-01-02 Thread Michael Jennings
On Monday, 02 January 2006, at 22:36:43 (+0100), Morten Nilsen wrote: > well, List2 is flagged as deprecated in the source (thus my patches) > and List is not double linked.. DList is Sarcasm. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., h

Re: [E-devel] [patch] ecore_list2 removal

2006-01-02 Thread Morten Nilsen
Michael Jennings wrote: On Monday, 02 January 2006, at 12:46:32 (-0600), Nathan Ingersoll wrote: I don't think there is a very cohesive plan on list use atm. I've heard a few rumblings of people saying "ecore lists suck" or "evas lists suck" but as usual it's a case of choosing the best tool fo

Re: [E-devel] [patch] ecore_list2 removal

2006-01-02 Thread Michael Jennings
On Monday, 02 January 2006, at 12:46:32 (-0600), Nathan Ingersoll wrote: > I don't think there is a very cohesive plan on list use atm. I've > heard a few rumblings of people saying "ecore lists suck" or "evas > lists suck" but as usual it's a case of choosing the best tool for > the job and knowi

Re: [E-devel] [patch] ecore_list2 removal

2006-01-02 Thread Nathan Ingersoll
Ecore_List is heavy if you have a lot of very small lists. It has a small set of pointers it keeps as head node for the list. The per-node memory use is smaller than Evas_List because Evas_List is a dlist and also keeps an extra pointer per-node to act as a skip-list, so the comparative memory use

Re: [E-devel] [patch] ecore_list2 removal

2006-01-02 Thread David Seikel
On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 22:11:23 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 12:53:58 +0100 Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > David; you might want to absorb the ecore_exe part of this patch > > into your current work :) > > It's next on my list to look it your

Re: [E-devel] [patch] ecore_list2 removal

2006-01-02 Thread Morten Nilsen
Morten Nilsen wrote: okay, I'm almost done with this now... only thing that needs to be converted at this point is ecore_event... I'll get on that later.. Okay, that last patch had some bugs.. this new patch works better... This has been tested with ecore_test and timer_example from ecore...

Re: [E-devel] [patch] ecore_list2 removal

2006-01-02 Thread David Seikel
On Mon, 02 Jan 2006 12:53:58 +0100 Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David; you might want to absorb the ecore_exe part of this patch into > your current work :) It's next on my list to look it your patch after my current task. Unless something more important comes up, like a bug I need

[E-devel] [patch] ecore_list2 removal

2006-01-02 Thread Morten Nilsen
okay, I'm almost done with this now... only thing that needs to be converted at this point is ecore_event... I'll get on that later.. David; you might want to absorb the ecore_exe part of this patch into your current work :) Cheers, -- Morten :wq Index: ecore_events.c ===