>
> no. "windows" reversed the convention. before windows existed in the mac
> and
> amiga etc. worlds shift was multi-select, control was range select. i am
> following the original convention by default. efm can switch to do it the
> "windows way". but nothng is exposed in the gui to do that - th
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 00:25:47 +0100 "Vincent Pomageot"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hi,
>
> As a user I'm very happy to see all this keen interest with efm. I really
> like it since I use the thumbscroll feature (sometimes I even try to scroll
> the firefox pages like this !) and I think it's goo
Hi,
As a user I'm very happy to see all this keen interest with efm. I really
like it since I use the thumbscroll feature (sometimes I even try to scroll
the firefox pages like this !) and I think it's good for basic operation /
navigation.
Nevertheless I'm used to select multiple files in a list
Holy Crap!!! ;-) Thanks Guys! I hadn't touched it in quite a while,
thanks for the direction! I can now dump thunar! ;-)
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 09:50 +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:27:20 -0500 jess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > Hello,
> > On this thread, I have
- "Nick Hughart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 00:03:14 +0100 (CET)
> Dave Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > - "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha
> scritto:
> >
> > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Dave Andreoli
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECT
2008/11/29 Viktor Kojouharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 00:13 +0100, Massimiliano Calamelli wrote:
>> 2008/11/28 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Dave Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>> 14. Another request remembered by an
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 00:19:16 -0200 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Dave Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > - "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> >
> >> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Dave Andreoli
>
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Dave Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Dave Andreoli
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> 14. Another request remembered by an user at #e: auto-mount and a
>>
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 00:13 +0100, Massimiliano Calamelli wrote:
> 2008/11/28 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Dave Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> 14. Another request remembered by an user at #e: auto-mount and a way
> >>> to force mount
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 00:03:14 +0100 (CET)
Dave Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Dave Andreoli
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> 14. Another request remembered by an user at #e: auto-
2008/11/28 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Dave Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 14. Another request remembered by an user at #e: auto-mount and a way
>>> to force mount and unmount of devices. It is annoying to keep an efm
>>> window open jus
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:10:00 -0200
"Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Dave Andreoli
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 14. Another request remembered by an user at #e: auto-mount and a
> >> way to force mount and unmount of devices. It is annoyi
- "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Dave Andreoli
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 14. Another request remembered by an user at #e: auto-mount and a
> way
> >> to force mount and unmount of devices. It is annoying to keep an
> efm
>
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 17:27:20 -0500 jess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hello,
> On this thread, I have tried to read all of them, but have not heard
> any mention of the multiple windows that get opened when using the built
> in file mgr. Is it configurable? I have looked, but have found no wa
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:54:58 -0200 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> > 15. Better handle the long filenames in iconview. Like if the name consists
> > of 2 or 3 words and it's too long for one line - move one of the words to a
> > second line. Same if it consists of one ver
- "jess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> Hello,
> On this thread, I have tried to read all of them, but have not
> heard
> any mention of the multiple windows that get opened when using the
> built
> in file mgr. Is it configurable? I have looked, but have found no
> way
> to have a dou
2008/11/28 jess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
> On this thread, I have tried to read all of them, but have not heard
> any mention of the multiple windows that get opened when using the built
> in file mgr. Is it configurable? I have looked, but have found no way
> to have a double click on a di
2008/11/29 jess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
> On this thread, I have tried to read all of them, but have not heard
> any mention of the multiple windows that get opened when using the built
> in file mgr. Is it configurable? I have looked, but have found no way
> to have a double click on a di
Hello,
On this thread, I have tried to read all of them, but have not heard
any mention of the multiple windows that get opened when using the built
in file mgr. Is it configurable? I have looked, but have found no way
to have a double click on a directory open in that windows, vs opening a
new
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Dave Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> - "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:46 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitz
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Dave Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:46 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:54:36 +0100 Chidambar 'ilLogi
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Dave Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 14. Another request remembered by an user at #e: auto-mount and a way
>> to force mount and unmount of devices. It is annoying to keep an efm
>> window open just to be able to use the device with other apps. Using
>> the a
- "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:29 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:23:08 -0200 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> >
> >> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:46
- "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:46 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:54:36 +0100 Chidambar 'ilLogict' Zinnoury
> > 2. all operations (copy, move, delete) have no progress on scree
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:46:03 +1100
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:54:36 +0100 Chidambar 'ilLogict' Zinnoury
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > I'm currently working on EFM, by trying to make operations atomic
> > (for mount
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Luchezar Petkov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 28/11/2008, at 12.15, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:29 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:23:08 -0200 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On 28/11/2008, at 12.15, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:29 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:23:08 -0200 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:46 PM, The Rast
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:29 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:23:08 -0200 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:46 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:23:08 -0200 "Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:46 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:54:36 +0100 Chidambar 'ilLogict' Zinnoury
> > 2. all operations (copy, move, delete)
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Alberto Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is more related to the "Confirm" (file(s)) delete dialog. I wish it
> was STACKED above all windows all the time, its troubling having to go
> search for it whenever another window gains focus.
>
> The current efm ic
This is more related to the "Confirm" (file(s)) delete dialog. I wish it
was STACKED above all windows all the time, its troubling having to go
search for it whenever another window gains focus.
The current efm icon_efm/dnd copy/move/ask behavior where you move a
file, and you lose sight of the
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:46 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:54:36 +0100 Chidambar 'ilLogict' Zinnoury
> 2. all operations (copy, move, delete) have no progress on screen - if there
> is
> a queue of work (like delete this dir then copy this t
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 20:54:36 +0100 Chidambar 'ilLogict' Zinnoury
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hello!
>
> I'm currently working on EFM, by trying to make operations atomic (for
> mount...).
> Work on EFM is always a big part of E's todo. But as I don't really
> use file managers, I don't real
Progress bars: But not in a seperate window. Keep it on the EFM
overlay edje part.
Thats all Ive got atm...
Toma
2008/11/28 Chidambar 'ilLogict' Zinnoury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello!
>
> I'm currently working on EFM, by trying to make operations atomic (for
> mount...).
> Work on EFM is alwa
Hello!
I'm currently working on EFM, by trying to make operations atomic (for
mount...).
Work on EFM is always a big part of E's todo. But as I don't really
use file managers, I don't really know:
- what doesn't work like expected,
- what features are missing,
- what kind of killer-features onl
35 matches
Mail list logo
