Re: [E-devel] discussion of elementary header separation.

Ok, I'm going to make a proposal with one widget which is very easy. Put documents to 1 header. (Elementary.h) Thanks. Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:24:48 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo > > said: > > i'm in the "1 header to r

Re: [E-devel] discussion of elementary header separation.

On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:24:48 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo said: i'm in the "1 header to rule them all and in the darkness bind them" camp... but also in the "throw those docs in the header" camp and frankly.. we already have some there due to structs and enums being documented. :) > Any further discu

Re: [E-devel] discussion of elementary header separation.

Anyway I hope the doxygen move to header. I don't care except 2. Thanks. Let's run together for the best moment! -Regards, Hermet- -Original Message- From: "Daniel Juyung Seo" To: "Carsten Haitzler"

Re: [E-devel] discussion of elementary header separation.

Any further discussion on this topic? I'm raising this topic again because I think it's time to refactor elementary doxygen. We agreed to move all doxygen to headers from c code. But there are duplicated dox in header and c in elementary. It's a mess. As we discussed so far there are a couple of o

Re: [E-devel] discussion of elementary header separation.

On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 23:13:58 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo said: i say... leave it :) > Any further discussion on this issue? > If there is no request and agreement, I'll drop this change. > > Thanks. > Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Atton Jonathan > wrote: > > > Mayb

Re: [E-devel] discussion of elementary header separation.

Any further discussion on this issue? If there is no request and agreement, I'll drop this change. Thanks. Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Atton Jonathan wrote: > Maybe we can split headers by type of widget: simple, list(genlist, list, > gengrid), map (it is a big head

Re: [E-devel] discussion of elementary header separation.

Maybe we can split headers by type of widget: simple, list(genlist, list, gengrid), map (it is a big header) ... 2011/4/9 Daniel Juyung Seo > Hello all, > I wanna raise a discussion of elementary header separation like eina. > > Raster is moving dox into headers. > I agree with him to put dox in

Re: [E-devel] discussion of elementary header separation.

On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 12:24 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > ugh. i actually hate these multiple headers. :) it means always having to go > open and look at a new file each time u want to see some bit of the api rather > than just scroll around the current one you have open for reference. As I tol

Re: [E-devel] discussion of elementary header separation.

Hi, this is Hermet. I think it need to move the doxygen to the header file since Elementry.h is for the users. If Elementary.h could not be accepted the doxygen because it's the full already, Then I agree with SeoZ, I guess Opening the another widget header file is not much burden tha

Re: [E-devel] discussion of elementary header separation.

On Sat, 9 Apr 2011 12:09:39 +0900 Daniel Juyung Seo said: > Hello all, > I wanna raise a discussion of elementary header separation like eina. > > Raster is moving dox into headers. > I agree with him to put dox into headers because developers can refer > headers directly. > (they could refer do

[E-devel] discussion of elementary header separation.

Hello all, I wanna raise a discussion of elementary header separation like eina. Raster is moving dox into headers. I agree with him to put dox into headers because developers can refer headers directly. (they could refer doxygen html as well.) But Elementary.h.in is already full and it will be m