On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:17:57 +0900 ChunEon Parkher...@naver.com said:
i say remove the smart object check from smart_data_get as its not that useful
and helps a lot here.
Ok. I see..
But even it's the simple way we can do,
I still wonder that the MAGIC CHECK is not strange in smart_data_get
removed!
Let's run together for the best moment!
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: Carsten Haitzlerlt;ras...@rasterman.comgt;
To: ChunEon Parklt;her...@naver.comgt;
Cc: EFLlt;enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.netgt;
Sent: 11-07-29(금)
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:04:38 +0900 ChunEon Parkher...@naver.com said:
we also have the elm error abort stuff too.
but as such i think some calls in evas can be made to not barf if its not a
smart object, like getting smart data. if its not a smart obj just safely
return null - thats basically
Ok. I see..
But even it's the simple way we can do,
I still wonder that the MAGIC CHECK is not strange in smart_data_get function
since it is just checking whether object is smart or not...
Do anybody has any other opinion ?
If many agree with raster (or nobody reply to this mail), then i will
Hello, EFL developers.
I just have one question and need your opinions.
In many cases, many non-smart objects are used in elementary
e.g) evas_object_rectangle.
Those objects are passed to elm_widget APIs frequently which
calls the smart_object_data_get in API_ENTRY define.
Since those are not
