Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:51:50 -0400 Christopher Michael
>
> said:
>
>> While working on the new shelf dialog, I noticed an API inconsistency:
>>
>> we have e_win_size_min_set but we also have e_widget_min_size_set ...
>>
>> which is prefered ? :
>>
>> e_w
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:51:50 -0400 Christopher Michael
said:
> While working on the new shelf dialog, I noticed an API inconsistency:
>
> we have e_win_size_min_set but we also have e_widget_min_size_set ...
>
> which is prefered ? :
>
> e_win_size_min_set
> e_widget_size_min_set
>
> OR
>
>
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Iván Briano
(Sachiel) wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Christopher
> Michael wrote:
>> While working on the new shelf dialog, I noticed an API inconsistency:
>>
>> we have e_win_size_min_set but we also have e_widget_min_size_set ...
>>
>> which is prefer
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Christopher
Michael wrote:
> While working on the new shelf dialog, I noticed an API inconsistency:
>
> we have e_win_size_min_set but we also have e_widget_min_size_set ...
>
> which is prefered ? :
>
> e_win_size_min_set
> e_widget_size_min_set
>
This one matches
While working on the new shelf dialog, I noticed an API inconsistency:
we have e_win_size_min_set but we also have e_widget_min_size_set ...
which is prefered ? :
e_win_size_min_set
e_widget_size_min_set
OR
e_win_min_size_set
e_widget_min_size_set
dh
-