Re: [E-devel] Continuous Integration, attempt #1

2011-02-20 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:51:38 -0600 Ravenlock said: > On 02/19/2011 08:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:17:03 +0100 Lionel Orry said: > > > > just fyi - CI is one of the lesser worries we have. so let's not make this > > more that it is - builds for us are s

Re: [E-devel] Continuous Integration, attempt #1

2011-02-20 Thread Ravenlock
On 02/19/2011 08:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:17:03 +0100 Lionel Orry said: > > just fyi - CI is one of the lesser worries we have. so let's not make this > more > that it is - builds for us are stable and well tested. i rebuild efl between > 1-4 times a d

Re: [E-devel] Continuous Integration, attempt #1

2011-02-20 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Lionel Orry wrote: > On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: >> On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:08:33 + Lionel Orry said: >> >>> I understand your explanation about builds. I know builds are stable >>> and do work fairly well on a variety of platfo

Re: [E-devel] Continuous Integration, attempt #1

2011-02-19 Thread Lionel Orry
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:08:33 + Lionel Orry said: > >> I understand your explanation about builds. I know builds are stable >> and do work fairly well on a variety of platforms. >> >> But when I talk about CI, I don't talk specifically

Re: [E-devel] Continuous Integration, attempt #1

2011-02-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 17:08:33 + Lionel Orry said: > I understand your explanation about builds. I know builds are stable > and do work fairly well on a variety of platforms. > > But when I talk about CI, I don't talk specifically about rebuilds, > but I am in the same problematic as you: I th

Re: [E-devel] Continuous Integration, attempt #1

2011-02-19 Thread Lionel Orry
I understand your explanation about builds. I know builds are stable and do work fairly well on a variety of platforms. But when I talk about CI, I don't talk specifically about rebuilds, but I am in the same problematic as you: I think about testing. Build bots have a wrong name in that they are

Re: [E-devel] Continuous Integration, attempt #1

2011-02-19 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 12:17:03 +0100 Lionel Orry said: just fyi - CI is one of the lesser worries we have. so let's not make this more that it is - builds for us are stable and well tested. i rebuild efl between 1-4 times a day. sometimes much more. between the developers we have little issue with

Re: [E-devel] Continuous Integration, attempt #1

2011-02-14 Thread Lionel Orry
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Ravenlock wrote: > > Can FreeBSD users play too, with the majority of ya'll running linux? > In the case of Buildbot and Jenkins, the concept of master/slave is central and should definitely be considered seriously. That means not only a build server, but distribu

Re: [E-devel] Continuous Integration, attempt #1

2011-02-11 Thread Lionel Orry
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote: > Does this include source code build only? > Or includes doxygen or www auto build? > Just curious :) It also includes doxygen generation via 'make doc'. The best for you to know is to go on the github page and try the instructions... in

Re: [E-devel] Continuous Integration, attempt #1

2011-02-11 Thread Daniel Juyung Seo
Does this include source code build only? Or includes doxygen or www auto build? Just curious :) Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Feb 12, 2011 11:01 AM, "Ravenlock" wrote: -- The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(

Re: [E-devel] Continuous Integration, attempt #1

2011-02-11 Thread Ravenlock
On 02/11/2011 04:58, Lionel Orry wrote: > Hi everyone, > > to give a starting point for a discussion about continuous integration > (I talked about Buildbot and Jenkins already, that's what CI is > about), I created a repository so that you can try it at home. I'm all for CI. It is extremely hel

Re: [E-devel] Continuous Integration, attempt #1

2011-02-11 Thread Cedric BAIL
Hi Lionel, On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Lionel Orry wrote: > to give a starting point for a discussion about continuous integration > (I talked about Buildbot and Jenkins already, that's what CI is > about), I created a repository so that you can try it at home. > > I don't expect it to work

[E-devel] Continuous Integration, attempt #1

2011-02-11 Thread Lionel Orry
Hi everyone, to give a starting point for a discussion about continuous integration (I talked about Buildbot and Jenkins already, that's what CI is about), I created a repository so that you can try it at home. I don't expect it to work perfectly the first time for everyone, but that's a starting