Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) writes:
> if they have binary pkgs - they they dont have headers either. basically pc
> files, headers etc. are part of the dev/devel pkgs that go alongside the lib
> core binary ones and so a dev/devel pkg without pc files is a broken/useless
> one. so you can as
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:55:55 -0300 Raphael Kubo da Costa
said:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) writes:
>
> > the rationale is that micro versions do not have anything change in a header
> > that would affect compatibility forwards or backwards. we shouldnt be adding
> > features in micro rel
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) writes:
> the rationale is that micro versions do not have anything change in a header
> that would affect compatibility forwards or backwards. we shouldnt be adding
> features in micro releases (adding enums, struct members, functions etc.).
> thus
> there is no
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:49:50 -0300 Raphael Kubo da Costa
said:
> So far, modules such as eina, evas and friends only define their major
> and minor versions on public headers such as Evas.h.
>
> While this is OK most of the time, one might also need to check the
> micro version as well -- my cur
So far, modules such as eina, evas and friends only define their major
and minor versions on public headers such as Evas.h.
While this is OK most of the time, one might also need to check the
micro version as well -- my current use case is performing version
checks without having to rely on pkg-co
