On 05/09/2019 14:41, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 20:28:50 +0900 Hermet Park said:
>
>> I think it's just preference problem.
>>
>> Anyhow, I prefer e-devel discussion
>>
>> But both are fine to me because both do functions enough.
>
> phab can't thread so it b
On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 20:28:50 +0900 Hermet Park said:
> I think it's just preference problem.
>
> Anyhow, I prefer e-devel discussion
>
> But both are fine to me because both do functions enough.
phab can't thread so it becomes impossible to deal with really :( knowing what
i have and have not r
I think it's just preference problem.
Anyhow, I prefer e-devel discussion
But both are fine to me because both do functions enough.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 6:05 PM Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> That's something I've been complaining about both on IRC and recently on
> phab too, so glad to se
Hey,
That's something I've been complaining about both on IRC and recently on
phab too, so glad to see you take action about it!
It's really hard to follow what's going on in the EFL world if you just
want to follow the high-level design discussions rather than every typo
fix patch / bug. I don't
Hey,
That's something I've been complaining about both on IRC and recently on
phab too, so glad to see you take action about it!
It's really hard to follow what's going on in the EFL world if you just
want to follow the high-level design discussions rather than every typo
fix patch / bug. I don't
I've noticed over time - the last few years a lot of discussion has broken down
for various reasons. It's being moved to phab as tickets or review where it
SHOULD be a discussion here on the mailing list.
Years ago we agreed on how to work. Phab would be for review and bug tickets.
Mailing list wo
