Why did you comment out all the printfs for invalid files? Those can be
useful if the .ini file is actually screwed up.
dan
Enlightenment CVS wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : raster
Project : e17
Module : libs/efreet
Dir : e17/libs/efreet/src/lib
Modified Files:
On Wed, 28 May 2008 22:09:11 -0400 dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Why did you comment out all the printfs for invalid files? Those can be
useful if the .ini file is actually screwed up.
they were rather annoying when you want to test parsing of screwed files... and
do you want the
Enlightenment CVS schrieb:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : raster
Project : e17
Module : libs/efreet
Dir : e17/libs/efreet/src/lib
Modified Files:
efreet_desktop.c efreet_desktop.h
Log Message:
return the void pointer return val from the run cb - not just 1 or 0
Hi (first mail on the mailing list),
Wouldn't it be more efficient if you only lowered the extension instead of the
whole file.
I know it's almost nothing cpu-wise, but it would still be useless to waste
some small cpu
cycles on this.
looking for the first '.' andd then lowering anything
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 02:09:46 -0400 Youness Alaoui
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Hi (first mail on the mailing list),
Wouldn't it be more efficient if you only lowered the extension instead of
the whole file. I know it's almost nothing cpu-wise, but it would still be
useless to waste some small
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 03:16:55PM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 02:09:46 -0400 Youness Alaoui
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Hi (first mail on the mailing list),
Wouldn't it be more efficient if you only lowered the extension instead of
the whole file. I know it's
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:24:15 +0200 Peter Wehrfritz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
yes - as it will only be comparing a series of extenstions after the first .
the lowering of the chars before that is harmless. this assumes the extension
is also stored in lower case too (which seems to be the case).
