Re: [E-devel] E SVN: kakaroto trunk/edje/src/bin

2012-11-28 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:07:17 -0500 Youness Alaoui said: > Hello again, > > So I looked at the 1.7 branch and the code there is very different so the > bug wasn't in it. The trunk uses a hash table with a free function that > frees the Part_Lookup structure, and the bug was that it was manually >

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: kakaroto trunk/edje/src/bin

2012-11-28 Thread Youness Alaoui
Hello again, So I looked at the 1.7 branch and the code there is very different so the bug wasn't in it. The trunk uses a hash table with a free function that frees the Part_Lookup structure, and the bug was that it was manually freeing one item without removing it from the hash table. In 1.7, it'

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: kakaroto trunk/edje/src/bin

2012-11-27 Thread Youness Alaoui
Oh cool, I'll backport it tomorrow! Thanks! I never realized there were branches, I thought new releases were always taken from the trunk! Thanks for the answers! On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:45:20 -0500 Youness Alaoui > said: > > > Backporte

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: kakaroto trunk/edje/src/bin

2012-11-27 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:45:20 -0500 Youness Alaoui said: > Backported? Sorry, what do you mean ? Are there different development > branches now ? (I haven't paid much attention to E develpment lately) > If yes, then yeah, it should be backported as it's a critical fix in my > opinion. look in bra

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: kakaroto trunk/edje/src/bin

2012-11-27 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Youness Alaoui wrote: > Backported? Sorry, what do you mean ? Are there different development > branches now ? (I haven't paid much attention to E develpment lately) > If yes, then yeah, it should be backported as it's a critical fix in my > opinion. Yes, we have

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: kakaroto trunk/edje/src/bin

2012-11-27 Thread Daniel Juyung Seo
I think Cedric pointed e/branches/edje-1.7? http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/browser/branches/edje-1.7?desc=1 We have branches for released version of efl. Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:45 AM, Youness Alaoui < kakar...@kakaroto.homelinux.net> wrote: > Backported? Sorry, what

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: kakaroto trunk/edje/src/bin

2012-11-27 Thread Youness Alaoui
Backported? Sorry, what do you mean ? Are there different development branches now ? (I haven't paid much attention to E develpment lately) If yes, then yeah, it should be backported as it's a critical fix in my opinion. On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote: > On Sat, Nov 24, 2012

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: kakaroto trunk/edje/src/bin

2012-11-26 Thread Cedric BAIL
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > edje: Fix segfault when deleted part stays in the hash table Shouldn't that be backported ? -- Cedric BAIL -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud in