On 10/12/2011 04:14 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
ahahahahaha... this is funny. Aside from embryo code, it's trivial to
regenerate the source. Actually editje willl use that function as it ignores
the actual edc contents and creates from eet structures.
Yes, I know decompilation is
Mike, we all know you by know and nobody would think this stupid idea was
yours. We know the reasons for this yet this doesn't stop us from
complaining :-)
Relax :-)
On Wednesday, October 12, 2011, Mike McCormack mj.mccorm...@samsung.com
wrote:
On 10/12/2011 04:14 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
ahahahahaha... this is funny. Aside from embryo code, it's trivial to
regenerate the source. Actually editje willl use that function as it ignores
the actual edc contents and creates from eet structures.
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:14:00 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
ahahahahaha... this is funny. Aside from embryo code, it's trivial to
regenerate the source. Actually editje willl use that function as it
ignores the actual edc contents and creates from eet structures.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:43 PM, David Seikel onef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:14:00 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
ahahahahaha... this is funny. Aside from embryo code, it's trivial to
regenerate the source. Actually editje willl use that
