On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:29:59 +0100 Quaker said:
still curious. why is ssh access needed?
> On this server, having user on server is connected with svn account. They
> don't commit, it is just for those ssh reasons. I know it is not a best way.
> I'll prepare some new system for next freeze.
>
>
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:10:23 +0100 Albin Tonnerre
said:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:42 +0100, Quaker wrote :
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Log:
> > >>> New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
> > >>
> > >> ?? how many peopl
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:58:48 +0100 Cedric BAIL said:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Stephen Houston wrote:
> > I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in widespread
> > use of our software, then packages/packagers are an essential part of
> > the process.
>
> It's a common p
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:46:40 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
said:
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> >
> >> Log:
> >> New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
> >
> > ?? how many people involved in p
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:42:54 +0100 Quaker said:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> >>
> >>> Log:
> >>> New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
> >>
> >> ?? how many people involved in packages do you plan to add ???
> >
> > i would like to add
i don't maintain debian stuff directly in libs/apps' dirs anymore. They are
in separated directory "packaging" and they are updated and merged with
generated snapshots. Anyway, i know svn account created just for ssh is bad.
I'll find a better solution and discuss it with raster.
2010/1/25 Albin T
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:22 -0600, Stephen Houston wrote :
>
> On Jan 25, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Albin Tonnerre
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:07 -0600, Stephen Houston wrote :
> >>
> >>On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Vincent Torri
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Stephen Houst
On this server, having user on server is connected with svn account. They
don't commit, it is just for those ssh reasons. I know it is not a best way.
I'll prepare some new system for next freeze.
2010/1/25 Albin Tonnerre
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:42 +0100, Quaker wrote :
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On
On Jan 25, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Albin Tonnerre
wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:07 -0600, Stephen Houston wrote :
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Vincent Torri
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Stephen Houston wrote:
>>>
I don't think this is a problem... If we are intereste
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:07 -0600, Stephen Houston wrote :
>
> On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Stephen Houston wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in widespread
> >> use of our software, then packages/packager
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:42 +0100, Quaker wrote :
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> >>
> >>> Log:
> >>> New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
> >>
> >> ?? how many people involved in packages do you plan to add ???
> >
> > i would like to add th
On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Stephen Houston wrote:
>
>> I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in widespread
>> use of our software, then packages/packagers are an essential part of
>> the process.
>
> it's not our job to package
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Stephen Houston wrote:
> I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in widespread
> use of our software, then packages/packagers are an essential part of
> the process.
It's a common process and good practice to let people first send patch
to the ML,
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Stephen Houston wrote:
> I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in widespread
> use of our software, then packages/packagers are an essential part of
> the process.
it's not our job to package our libs and binaries... It's the job of the
package managers o
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Quaker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>>>
Log:
New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
>>>
>>> ?? how many people involved in packages do you plan to add ???
>>
>> i would like to add that, before giving gi
I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in widespread
use of our software, then packages/packagers are an essential part of
the process.
On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Quaker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>>>
Log:
New e17 packager -
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>>
>>> Log:
>>> New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
>>
>> ?? how many people involved in packages do you plan to add ???
>
> i would like to add that, before giving giving svn rights to someone, we
> usually like th
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>
>> Log:
>> New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
>
> ?? how many people involved in packages do you plan to add ???
i would like to add that, before giving giving svn righ
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
?? how many people involved in packages do you plan to add ???
Vincent
> Author: quaker
> Date: 2010-01-25 10:53:21 -0800 (Mon, 25 Jan 2010)
> New Revision:
19 matches
Mail list logo
