On 02/29/2012 05:05 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:25:18 -0500 Christopher Michael
> said:
>
>> On 02/29/2012 01:57 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:51:37 -0500 Christopher
>>> Michael said:
>>>
>>> btw.. i noticed wayland
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:25:18 -0500 Christopher Michael
said:
> On 02/29/2012 01:57 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:51:37 -0500 Christopher
> > Michael said:
> >
> > btw.. i noticed wayland_shm/egl engines dont implement the alpha_set engine
> > funcs! :( ie
On 02/29/2012 01:57 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:51:37 -0500 Christopher Michael
> said:
>
> btw.. i noticed wayland_shm/egl engines dont implement the alpha_set engine
> funcs! :( ie turn dest alpha on/off on canvas (and buffers/surfaces
> accordingly)
>
al
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:51:37 -0500 Christopher Michael
said:
btw.. i noticed wayland_shm/egl engines dont implement the alpha_set engine
funcs! :( ie turn dest alpha on/off on canvas (and buffers/surfaces accordingly)
> Oops ! :( How did I miss that one ? Hrrm...
>
> Anyway, thanks mate ;)
>
>
On 02/28/2012 08:17 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:14:53 -0500
> Christopher Michael wrote:
>
>> On 02/28/2012 07:54 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:51:37 -0500
>>> Christopher Michael wrote:
>>>
Oops ! :( How did I miss that one ? Hrrm..
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:14:53 -0500
Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 02/28/2012 07:54 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:51:37 -0500
> > Christopher Michael wrote:
> >
> >> Oops ! :( How did I miss that one ? Hrrm...
> >>
> >> Anyway, thanks mate ;)
> >>
> >> dh
> >>
> >> O
On 02/28/2012 07:54 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:51:37 -0500
> Christopher Michael wrote:
>
>> Oops ! :( How did I miss that one ? Hrrm...
>>
>> Anyway, thanks mate ;)
>>
>> dh
>>
>> On 02/28/2012 06:55 PM, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>>> Log:
>>> lets compile again... sha
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:51:37 -0500
Christopher Michael wrote:
> Oops ! :( How did I miss that one ? Hrrm...
>
> Anyway, thanks mate ;)
>
> dh
>
> On 02/28/2012 06:55 PM, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> > Log:
> > lets compile again... shall we? :)
> >
> >
> >
> > Author: raster
> > Date:
Oops ! :( How did I miss that one ? Hrrm...
Anyway, thanks mate ;)
dh
On 02/28/2012 06:55 PM, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> lets compile again... shall we? :)
>
>
>
> Author: raster
> Date: 2012-02-28 15:55:04 -0800 (Tue, 28 Feb 2012)
> New Revision: 68526
> Trac: http:
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:05:22 +0100 Vincent Torri said:
nah - this isnt a bugfix - just a cleanup. i backported other bugfixes just
now. :)
> backport (1.0, 1.1) ?
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
> > Log:
> > move render func into struct - dont set it later.
> >
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 7:54 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> address fixme's in extn :)
>
>
>
> Author: raster
> Date: 2011-12-18 22:54:08 -0800 (Sun, 18 Dec 2011)
> New Revision: 66320
> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/66320
>
> Modified:
> trunk/ecore
On 14/12/11 10:05, Vincent Torri wrote:
> backport (1.0, 1.1) ?
Do we still maintain 1.0? If so, until when do we plan on maintaining it?
Thanks,
Tom.
--
Cloud Computing - Latest Buzzword or a Glimpse of the Future?
Thi
backport (1.0, 1.1) ?
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> move render func into struct - dont set it later.
>
>
>
> Author: raster
> Date: 2011-12-13 23:53:18 -0800 (Tue, 13 Dec 2011)
> New Revision: 66177
> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/
Thanks!
On Friday, October 14, 2011, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:01:19 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
> done :)
>
>> I'm on the road (actually about to get into a plane), would you apply
this
>> to EWS engine as well? It's basically a copy of buffer with few change
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:01:19 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
done :)
> I'm on the road (actually about to get into a plane), would you apply this
> to EWS engine as well? It's basically a copy of buffer with few changes
>
> On Friday, October 14, 2011, Enlightenment SVN
> wrote:
> > Log:
I'm on the road (actually about to get into a plane), would you apply this
to EWS engine as well? It's basically a copy of buffer with few changes
On Friday, October 14, 2011, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> 1. make inline image ee buffer non-alpha by default. thats the default
> for all eee's
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> and we were missing vsync set support in ecore-evas, but had indirect
> support. fix.
>
>
>
> Author: raster
> Date: 2010-12-26 02:17:31 -0800 (Sun, 26 Dec 2010)
> New Revision: 55755
> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> fix artifacts on window rotation
>
>
> Author: raster
> Date: 2009-06-11 22:32:01 -0700 (Thu, 11 Jun 2009)
> New Revision: 41010
>
> Modified:
> trunk/ecore/src/lib/ecore_evas/ecore_evas.c
>
> Modified: trunk/ecore/src/lib/ec
18 matches
Mail list logo
