Re: [E-devel] E17 user level documentation

2005-03-12 Thread Nathan Ingersoll
This documentation looks quite good to me. Anyone have an objection to setting them up with accounts to get this on e.org? We're already pointing people on IRC to their lude.net site on a regular basis. On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:43:40 +, Valtteri Vainikka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all, >

Re: [E-devel] E17 user level documentation

2005-03-11 Thread Ibukun Olumuyiwa
E16.8 is the only version that will coexist with E17 under the same install prefix. You can still run older versions of E16, but they have to be installed in a different prefix from E17. On Fri 11 Mar 2005, Paul Moss wrote: > I was just reading through and I noticed under the FAQ question: > Q: I

Re: [E-devel] E17 user level documentation

2005-03-11 Thread Paul Moss
I was just reading through and I noticed under the FAQ question: Q: I have E16 installed. Do I need to uninstall it so I can install E17? It says that they can happily co-exist as long as they are installed in different directories (/usr and /usr/local). I remember a little while ago some message

[E-devel] E17 user level documentation

2005-03-11 Thread Valtteri Vainikka
Hey all, First of all, I'd like to greet everyone here - this is my first post on this mailing list. I've been been writing and maintaining the lude.net/edocs guide with Tom Kuther for quite a while already. Recently we were asked by Benr if we wanted to write some users documentation for E17. So