the infamous #ifndef
EO_IS_UNDER_DEVELOPMENT_AND_API_WILL_CHANGE_AND_I_KNOW_ABOUT_THAT;
#error "Eo is under development and API will change"; #endif should
help. I don't mind the actual libname/release it we make sure the code
is aware of that.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
>> wrote:
>>> sure, but it sounds more like "pre-alpha" than beta at this point
>>> considering the amount of rewrite occurring.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
>> sure, but it sounds more like "pre-alpha" than beta at this point
>> considering the amount of rewrite occurring.
>
> There is still no agreement about if we are going to change
On 23/07/13 08:46, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As the time comes, we are trying to move to a time based release. But
> as the discussion on Eo does show, it takes time to reach a consensus
> on some API and make it difficult to move forward on a release.
>
> So I have introduced a macro EFL_BET
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> sure, but it sounds more like "pre-alpha" than beta at this point
> considering the amount of rewrite occurring.
There is still no agreement about if we are going to change any of the
existing API or not. It is still a discussion. And
sure, but it sounds more like "pre-alpha" than beta at this point
considering the amount of rewrite occurring.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
> > I don't understand why we can't just remove all those from the
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> I don't understand why we can't just remove all those from the public
> headers. If we're still rewriting them so much that they need to be marked
> as beta, they should not be released at all imo.
Because we use it. That's the point.
I don't understand why we can't just remove all those from the public
headers. If we're still rewriting them so much that they need to be marked
as beta, they should not be released at all imo.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As the time comes, we are trying to m
Hello,
As the time comes, we are trying to move to a time based release. But
as the discussion on Eo does show, it takes time to reach a consensus
on some API and make it difficult to move forward on a release.
So I have introduced a macro EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT that is used to
disable API that we
