On 06/12/11 08:36, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:34:08 +1100
> Jochen Schröder wrote:
>
>> On 23/11/11 19:14, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:50:32 +1100
>>> Jochen Schröder wrote:
>>
>>
>>
Hope this helps figuring out what the problem is.
>>
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:34:08 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
> On 23/11/11 19:14, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:50:32 +1100
> > Jochen Schröder wrote:
>
>
>
> >>
> >> Hope this helps figuring out what the problem is.
> > I didn't forget about this, just haven't been doing a
On 23/11/11 19:14, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:50:32 +1100
> Jochen Schröder wrote:
>>
>> Hope this helps figuring out what the problem is.
> I didn't forget about this, just haven't been doing anything e-related for a
> couple days. I have some testing to do on my side be
On 23/11/2011 09:14, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:50:32 +1100
> Jochen Schröder wrote:
>
>> OK I think I'm getting closer to find out what is going on. I assume
>> you were looking for some line like: INF<2163>:efm
>> e_fm_main_eeze.c:530 _scanner_delay() Attempting scanner co
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:50:32 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
> On 19/11/11 21:08, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:05:07 +1100
> > Jochen Schröder wrote:
> >
> >> On 19/11/11 18:59, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:54:47 +1100
> >>> Jochen Schröder wrote:
>
On 19/11/11 21:08, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:05:07 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
On 19/11/11 18:59, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:54:47 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
On 11/18/2011 08:29 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:20:21 +1100
On 19/11/11 21:08, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:05:07 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
On 19/11/11 18:59, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:54:47 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
On 11/18/2011 08:29 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:20:21 +1100
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 21:05:07 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
> On 19/11/11 18:59, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:54:47 +1100
> > Jochen Schröder wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/18/2011 08:29 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:20:21 +1100
> >>> Jochen Schröder wro
On 19/11/11 18:59, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:54:47 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
On 11/18/2011 08:29 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:20:21 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
On 18/11/11 16:48, Jochen Schröder wrote:
On 18/11/11 15:56, Mike Blumenkrantz
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:54:47 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
> On 11/18/2011 08:29 PM, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:20:21 +1100
> > Jochen Schröder wrote:
> >
> >> On 18/11/11 16:48, Jochen Schröder wrote:
> >>> On 18/11/11 15:56, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, 18 No
On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:47:27 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
> On 18/11/11 16:56, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:35:24 +1100
> > Jochen Schröder wrote:
> >
> >> On 18/11/11 15:50, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:48:22 +1100
> >>> Jochen Schröder wrote:
>
On 18/11/11 16:56, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:35:24 +1100
> Jochen Schröder wrote:
>
>> On 18/11/11 15:50, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:48:22 +1100
>>> Jochen Schröder wrote:
>>>
On 18/11/11 13:16, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:20:21 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
> On 18/11/11 16:48, Jochen Schröder wrote:
> > On 18/11/11 15:56, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> >> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:50:09 +1100
> >> Jochen Schröder wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 18/11/11 15:46, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 20
On 18/11/11 16:48, Jochen Schröder wrote:
On 18/11/11 15:56, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:50:09 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
On 18/11/11 15:46, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:43:23 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
On 18/11/11 13:16, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:35:24 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
> On 18/11/11 15:50, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:48:22 +1100
> > Jochen Schröder wrote:
> >
> >> On 18/11/11 13:16, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:18:50 +1100
> >>> Jochen Schröder wrote:
>
On 18/11/11 15:56, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:50:09 +1100
> Jochen Schröder wrote:
>
>> On 18/11/11 15:46, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:43:23 +1100
>>> Jochen Schröder wrote:
>>>
On 18/11/11 13:16, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2
On 18/11/11 16:09, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:48:22 +1100
> Jochen Schröder wrote:
>
>> On 18/11/11 13:16, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:18:50 +1100
>>> Jochen Schröder wrote:
>>>
Hi all,
I'm still trying to get eeze mount to work in E_
On 18/11/11 15:50, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:48:22 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
On 18/11/11 13:16, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:18:50 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
Hi all,
I'm still trying to get eeze mount to work in E_FM. I have build eeze
with l
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:48:22 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
> On 18/11/11 13:16, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:18:50 +1100
> > Jochen Schröder wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'm still trying to get eeze mount to work in E_FM. I have build eeze
> >> with libmount support (2
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:50:09 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
> On 18/11/11 15:46, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:43:23 +1100
> > Jochen Schröder wrote:
> >
> >> On 18/11/11 13:16, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:18:50 +1100
> >>> Jochen Schröder wrote:
>
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:48:22 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
> On 18/11/11 13:16, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:18:50 +1100
> > Jochen Schröder wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'm still trying to get eeze mount to work in E_FM. I have build eeze
> >> with libmount support (2
On 18/11/11 15:46, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:43:23 +1100
> Jochen Schröder wrote:
>
>> On 18/11/11 13:16, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
>>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:18:50 +1100
>>> Jochen Schröder wrote:
>>>
Hi all,
I'm still trying to get eeze mount to work in E_
On 18/11/11 13:16, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:18:50 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
Hi all,
I'm still trying to get eeze mount to work in E_FM. I have build eeze
with libmount support (2.19.1). And I am building E17 with ./configure
--disable-mount-hal --disable-mount-udisks
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:43:23 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
> On 18/11/11 13:16, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:18:50 +1100
> > Jochen Schröder wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I'm still trying to get eeze mount to work in E_FM. I have build eeze
> >> with libmount support (2
On 18/11/11 13:16, Mike Blumenkrantz wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:18:50 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
Hi all,
I'm still trying to get eeze mount to work in E_FM. I have build eeze
with libmount support (2.19.1). And I am building E17 with ./configure
--disable-mount-hal --disable-mount-udisks
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:18:50 +1100
Jochen Schröder wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm still trying to get eeze mount to work in E_FM. I have build eeze
> with libmount support (2.19.1). And I am building E17 with ./configure
> --disable-mount-hal --disable-mount-udisks, here is the relevant
> configure
Hi all,
I'm still trying to get eeze mount to work in E_FM. I have build eeze
with libmount support (2.19.1). And I am building E17 with ./configure
--disable-mount-hal --disable-mount-udisks, here is the relevant
configure output:
Preferred Backends:
* device..: eeze
* hal_mo
27 matches
Mail list logo