On 08/08/13 21:47, Mike McCormack wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 09:59 PM, Christopher Michael wrote:
>
>> Are you ok if I fix this (use g_source_remove_poll there). Or are you
>> already planning to fix this ??
>
Fixed upstream now :)
> Go ahead and fix it. I've just started a new job, and am a bit sho
On 08/08/2013 09:59 PM, Christopher Michael wrote:
> Are you ok if I fix this (use g_source_remove_poll there). Or are you
> already planning to fix this ??
Go ahead and fix it. I've just started a new job, and am a bit short on
time right now. I did manage to get efl/ecore building (gah! bull
On 08/08/13 12:03, Mike McCormack wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 07:27 PM, Christopher Michael wrote:
>> I believe that I have discovered a problem with the glib integration
>> into ecore main loop. Basically the issue is this:
>>
>> _ecore_main_fdh_poll_add is calling g_source_add_poll (which seems correc
Random bug spotting in this case, though I can confirm that the integration
is still totally functional.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Mike McCormack wrote:
> On 08/08/2013 07:27 PM, Christopher Michael wrote:
> > I believe that I have discovered a problem with the glib integration
> > into e
On 08/08/2013 07:27 PM, Christopher Michael wrote:
> I believe that I have discovered a problem with the glib integration
> into ecore main loop. Basically the issue is this:
>
> _ecore_main_fdh_poll_add is calling g_source_add_poll (which seems correct)
>
> BUT
>
> _ecore_main_fdh_poll_del is call
I believe that I have discovered a problem with the glib integration
into ecore main loop. Basically the issue is this:
_ecore_main_fdh_poll_add is calling g_source_add_poll (which seems correct)
BUT
_ecore_main_fdh_poll_del is callback g_source_add_poll also (which
smells wrong).
Shouldn't t
