On Wednesday 24 September 2003 08:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Eterm is a terminal emulator. 'Kool' often translates into 'unreadable on
> a long-term basis' - the fact that something is doable isn't always
> sufficient reason for actually doing it.
true, but any plans on anti aliased font supp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 03:22:17 PDT, Ben Rockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
it'd undoubtly be a resource hog, but damn you could do some awsome themes
for Eterm with Edje for the interface. Kool theme ideas would be text fx
(fading, etc), theming _above_ the rendered te
On Wednesday, 24 September 2003, at 03:22:17 (-0700),
Ben Rockwood wrote:
> Just a thought, could Eterm possibly be Edjified? Besides just the
> question of "will someone do it", the more immediate question would
> be, is it possible?The terminal text itself would need to be an EVAS
> or Etox tex
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 23:05:07 +0200 Cristalle Azundris Sabon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > My real concern is that there's a lot more copies of Photoshop out there
> > than there are actual qualified graphic artists... You know *exactly*
> > what I m
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:15:05 -0500 Brian Mattern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> ben,
> an edje based term would allow for a lot more flexibility in theming,
> but we need to do some tests to see if etox (or even evas text
> handling) is up to the task. If I get some free time,
ben,
an edje based term would allow for a lot more flexibility in theming,
but we need to do some tests to see if etox (or even evas text
handling) is up to the task. If I get some free time, I'll look at how
etox handles large volumes of text. However, there is still quite a bit
of work to do
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 03:22:17 PDT, Ben Rockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
>> it'd undoubtly be a resource hog, but damn you could do some awsome
>> themes for Eterm with Edje for the interface. Kool theme ideas would
>> be text fx (fading, etc), theming _above_ the rendered text (glass
>> eff
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> My real concern is that there's a lot more copies of Photoshop out there
> than there are actual qualified graphic artists... You know *exactly*
> what I mean. :)
>
> I'm not opposed to gratuitous eye candy, but only when it's not getting
> in the way. If I hated eye
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:41:07 +0200, Cristalle Azundris Sabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> That was my first reaction too, but I think as long as you play
> fancy with the buttons etc. only (and leave the actual text
> widget alone to a large extent) it might work. Time will tell
> whether
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 03:22:17 PDT, Ben Rockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> it'd undoubtly be a resource hog, but damn you could do some awsome themes
> for Eterm with Edje for the interface. Kool theme ideas would be text fx
> (fading, etc), theming _above_ the rendered text (glass effects), ful
Just a thought, could Eterm possibly be Edjified? Besides just the question
of "will someone do it", the more immediate question would be, is it
possible?The terminal text itself would need to be an EVAS or Etox text object, and
it'd undoubtly be a resource hog, but damn you could do some awsome
11 matches
Mail list logo
