On 27 January 2016 at 00:03, Felipe Magno de Almeida <
felipe.m.alme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > On 26/01/16 14:42, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> >> Hello.
>
> [snip]
>
> >> JP, Tom are you happy with Felipe's explanation? If
Hello.
On 13/01/16 11:56, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 13/01/16 02:38, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
>> Hi Felipe,
>>
>> You added the optional type to eina value. I'm not sure what it's point is.
>> I understand an optional value can be empty (ie. void and not "nil" or 0 or
>> whatever).
>>
>> But I
On 26/01/16 14:42, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 13/01/16 11:56, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 13/01/16 02:38, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
>>> Hi Felipe,
>>>
>>> You added the optional type to eina value. I'm not sure what it's point is.
>>> I understand an optional value can be empty (ie. void
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 26/01/16 14:42, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
[snip]
>> JP, Tom are you happy with Felipe's explanation? If not we need to act
>> now as we only have 6 days left before the release and once it is in
>> 1.17 it
Hello,
Sorry to answer myself, but complementing on what I've said before.
There's also ABI and optimization's concern on adding empty value for
all types. Since Eina_Value is defined in eina_value.h header, it is
public and needs to be backwards compatible ABI-wise, and since it can
be used by
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> You added the optional type to eina value. I'm not sure what it's point is.
> I understand an optional value can be empty (ie. void and not "nil" or 0 or
> whatever).
>
> But I don't understand why
On 13/01/16 02:38, Jean-Philippe André wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> You added the optional type to eina value. I'm not sure what it's point is.
> I understand an optional value can be empty (ie. void and not "nil" or 0 or
> whatever).
>
> But I don't understand why this couldn't be implemented inside
Hi Felipe,
You added the optional type to eina value. I'm not sure what it's point is.
I understand an optional value can be empty (ie. void and not "nil" or 0 or
whatever).
But I don't understand why this couldn't be implemented inside all standard
values. Add an "empty" property to them.