Re: [E-devel] Eloquence - Re: converting modules to 'new' API

2006-07-14 Thread phriedrich
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:17:27 + Hannes Janetzek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Moin, > ich hab es wirklich nur für meine Zwecke zum laufen gebracht, das > theme ist hardcoded und schlimmeres... Ach ja, aufgeräumt hab ich den > code auch nicht. :) Ich hab jetzt noch nicht reingesehen, aber es ist

Re: [E-devel] Eloquence

2006-03-23 Thread Mike Russo
phriedrich wrote: > > Which version of e and eloquence are you running? My e is about one week > olde (because of the CVS problems) but I had no problems at all. > Maybe cleaning away your ~/.e/e/config/default/*eloquence* helps. > > Sorry, it's not the configuration dialog per se -- i did some

Re: [E-devel] Eloquence

2006-03-22 Thread David Seikel
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:41:09 -0500 "Ryan Little" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/22/06, Brian Mattern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 22 March 2006 14:46, phriedrich wrote: > > > > How about releasing tarballs at stable points in module dev, and > > sticking those up on get-e? Th

Re: [E-devel] Eloquence

2006-03-22 Thread Ryan Little
On 3/22/06, Brian Mattern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wednesday 22 March 2006 14:46, phriedrich wrote:How about releasing tarballs at stable points in module dev, and stickingthose up on get-e? The modules are in cvs to facilitate development (and notas an alternative distribution method), so its

Re: [E-devel] Eloquence

2006-03-22 Thread phriedrich
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:33:26 -0500 Mike Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > phriedrich wrote: > > I think this would be a good idea. Stable snapshots of the modules on > > get-e.org and the devel-versions on CVS. > > But nevertheless, I'd also mention CVS-only modules on get-e.org, just > > becaus

Re: [E-devel] Eloquence

2006-03-22 Thread Mike Russo
Brian Mattern wrote: > How about releasing tarballs at stable points in module dev, and sticking > those up on get-e? The modules are in cvs to facilitate development (and not > as an alternative distribution method), so its still up to the maintainer to > release packages (binary or source) for

Re: [E-devel] Eloquence

2006-03-22 Thread phriedrich
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:03:01 -0600 Brian Mattern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 22 March 2006 14:46, phriedrich wrote: > > I think we should have the modules-section of get-e.org mentioning > > all the modules, maybe even the ones coming with e itself and have > > a note like "built in"

Re: [E-devel] Eloquence

2006-03-22 Thread Brian Mattern
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 14:46, phriedrich wrote: > There's only one small point about modules and CVS in but this is not > eloquence specific: All the modules that were taken to the CVS are not > longer appearing on get-e. This isn't a problem for us using CVS and know > what modules are in, bu

Re: [E-devel] Eloquence

2006-03-22 Thread Hawkwind
On 3/22/06, phriedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for bringing this topic up. > I think we could do this without getting into problems as eloquence is > pretty stable right now and is to compiled and running without any > problems as far as I know, I got very positive feedback for

Re: [E-devel] Eloquence

2006-03-22 Thread phriedrich
Hi, thanks for bringing this topic up. I think we could do this without getting into problems as eloquence is pretty stable right now and is to compiled and running without any problems as far as I know, I got very positive feedback for it within last time. In past I were successful at keeping it

[E-devel] Eloquence

2006-03-21 Thread Hawkwind
I've noticed that evolume was placed into CVS last night or the day before and I was wondering what it would take for us to be able to get eloquence into CVS as well ? phreidrich is the maintainer of Eloquence and I think it would be a great addition to have in CVS since quite a few users seem to

Re: [E-devel] eloquence 0.4.5 fails to compile

2006-01-24 Thread Eric Sandall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, phriedrich wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:51:38 -0800 (PST) Eric Sandall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have enlightenment from 20060110 and no prior installation of eloquence install

Re: [E-devel] eloquence 0.4.5 fails to compile

2006-01-22 Thread phriedrich
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:15:37 + Foxy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > thanks a lot! I hope it works now. http://www.phriedrich.artfact.at/eloquence.php (eloquence-0.4.7.tar.gz) Also includes updates to work with config_dialog changes from this afternoon. signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [E-devel] eloquence 0.4.5 fails to compile

2006-01-21 Thread phriedrich
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:10:25 + Foxy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > phriedrich wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:47:22 + > > Foxy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> It used > >> to, but now I cannot select amarok and eloquence does not display > >> songs anymore. What could be a prob

Re: [E-devel] eloquence 0.4.5 fails to compile

2006-01-21 Thread phriedrich
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:47:22 + Foxy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It used > to, but now I cannot select amarok and eloquence does not display songs > anymore. What could be a problem? Is amarok in $PATH at compile-time? It checks if it's present, when not it will be not enabled, and no entry

Re: [E-devel] eloquence 0.4.5 fails to compile

2006-01-21 Thread Foxy
phriedrich wrote: On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:31:08 + Foxy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: thanks a lot. It compiles now but segfaults when I try to enable it :( Try to delete eloquence' old config then, look into the README for that. Right on the end there's described how to do

Re: [E-devel] eloquence 0.4.5 fails to compile

2006-01-17 Thread phriedrich
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:31:08 + Foxy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > thanks a lot. It compiles now but segfaults when I try to enable it :( > Try to delete eloquence' old config then, look into the README for that. Right on the end there's described how to do that. Regards, Friedrich s

Re: [E-devel] eloquence 0.4.5 fails to compile

2006-01-17 Thread phriedrich
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:39:36 +0100 phriedrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:53:05 + > Foxy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I've got the latest cvs update. > > > > My e is about four or five days old, looks like something has been > changed, I'll look into it. I fi

Re: [E-devel] eloquence 0.4.5 fails to compile

2006-01-16 Thread phriedrich
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:53:05 + Foxy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got the latest cvs update. > My e is about four or five days old, looks like something has been changed, I'll look into it. Regards, Friedrich signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [E-devel] eloquence 0.4.5 fails to compile

2006-01-16 Thread Foxy
phriedrich wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:51:38 -0800 (PST) Eric Sandall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have enlightenment from 20060110 and no prior installation of eloquence installed. While compiling I get this error: gcc -shared .libs/e_mod_ma

Re: [E-devel] eloquence 0.4.5 fails to compile

2006-01-12 Thread phriedrich
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:51:38 -0800 (PST) Eric Sandall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > I have enlightenment from 20060110 and no prior installation of > eloquence installed. While compiling I get this error: > gcc -shared .libs/e_mod_main.o .libs/e

[E-devel] eloquence 0.4.5 fails to compile

2006-01-12 Thread Eric Sandall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have enlightenment from 20060110 and no prior installation of eloquence installed. While compiling I get this error: gcc -shared .libs/e_mod_main.o .libs/e_mod_config.o .libs/xmms.o .libs/bmp.o .libs/bmpx.o .libs/audacious.o .libs/amarok.o .libs/mp