On Thursday, 01 September 2005, at 00:15:48 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> oh PHEW! :) thank god! :)
Oh ye of little faith. You must trust in the JBJ! He is wise and
all-knowing! :-)
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n + 1, Inc., http
On Wednesday, 31 August 2005, at 10:47:28 (-0400),
Jim Perrin wrote:
> In any event I had some time to sit down and read the link Didier
> posted, and I don't see how it hurts anything to spell out the
> Requires. It might be redundant, but that would be about it.
Well, you must also consider the
On 8/31/05, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 31 August 2005, at 16:25:14 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> >
> > weird. its a build requires. it should not think this. this is not a good
> > thing
> > imho. can you turn it OFF? a BUILD may require edje-devel but runti
On 8/31/05, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP]
> In any event I had some time to sit down and read the link Didier
> posted, and I don't see how it hurts anything to spell out the
> Requires. It might be redundant, but that would be about it.
My whole point is summarized in one sentenc
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 10:12:37 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> No, it's not a good thing. Fortunately, it's not true either. :-)
oh PHEW! :) thank god! :)
> > hmm rpm has gone downhill - this above is bad imho. there are cases
> > where it will be wrong.
>
> Then it's a go
On 8/31/05, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > RHEL/CentOS are not designed to build in a chroot.
> >
> > Fortunately I build all my packages in a clean chroot for cAos, so I
> > know they work. You can find build logs, packages, and
> > post-dependency package lists for each package at, e.
> RHEL/CentOS are not designed to build in a chroot.
>
> Fortunately I build all my packages in a clean chroot for cAos, so I
> know they work. You can find build logs, packages, and
> post-dependency package lists for each package at, e.g.,
> http://mirror.caosity.org/cAos-2/ext/autobuilder/i386
On Wednesday, 31 August 2005, at 07:29:42 (-0400),
Jim Perrin wrote:
> Actually that's good to know and thanks for pointing it out. I've
> been doing things the other either for habit or because I picked up
> the incorrect method somewhere along the line. In any event, I think
> things are far eno
On Wednesday, 31 August 2005, at 16:25:14 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > e.g if you state that package X:
> >
> > BuildRequires: edje-devel
> >
> > Only stating this would imply for a tool like yum/apt to automatically
> > download edje for RUNNING the application.
> >
> > i.e if you type
>
> Maybe I expressed myself wrongly or wass too quick at writing something.
>
> RPM has very good capabilities of automatically finding dependencies
> for libraries.
>
> e.g if you state that package X:
>
> BuildRequires: edje-devel
>
> Only stating this would imply for a tool like yum/apt to
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 16:25 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:29:58 +0800 Didier Casse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
> > e.g if you state that package X:
> >
> > BuildRequires: edje-devel
> >
> > Only stating this would imply for a tool like yum/apt to automatically
> > dow
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:29:58 +0800 Didier Casse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On 8/31/05, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:02:26 +0800 Didier Casse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> > > On 8/29/05, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On 8/31/05, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:02:26 +0800 Didier Casse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> > On 8/29/05, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Quick patch to a couple Makefile.am's in embrace to allow it to make
> > > dist clean
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:02:26 +0800 Didier Casse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On 8/29/05, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Quick patch to a couple Makefile.am's in embrace to allow it to make
> > dist cleanly, and a spec file to aid in rpm packaging.
> > --
> Hi Jim,
> Thanks
On 8/29/05, Jim Perrin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quick patch to a couple Makefile.am's in embrace to allow it to make
> dist cleanly, and a spec file to aid in rpm packaging.
> --
Hi Jim,
Thanks. However I've a tiny remark: when you have have a
package X-devel in BuildRequires, then
Quick patch to a couple Makefile.am's in embrace to allow it to make
dist cleanly, and a spec file to aid in rpm packaging.
--
Jim Perrin
System Administrator - UIT
Ft Gordon & US Army Signal Center
? embrace.spec
Index: Makefile.am
=
16 matches
Mail list logo
