Yes, unfortunately we need a widget toolkit. I'm largely letting Essien
make the call on this one, but we might even go with both. This is the
kind of situation I dreaded when ETK first started up, and unfortunately
some people will consider a choice of one toolkit over another as some
sort of
I've begun looking at laying the initial groundwork for the Entrance GUI
config/control center. To do this, I can either choose etk or ewl or
(ewww!!! build yet another e toolkit (YAET!), I'm too lazy to do that
anyways).
This is probably going to generate a lot of comment anyways, so I may as
Rapid update. Raster just informed me, this is _not_ going to happen,
because the e internal widgets don't really have a long live-span and
are currently just a minor convenience. They may soon go to the dogs,
without warning too :).
I guess the point in the thread is basically m(0.o)t then,
On 8/9/06, Essien Ita Essien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rapid update. Raster just informed me, this is _not_ going to happen,
because the e internal widgets don't really have a long live-span and
are currently just a minor convenience. They may soon go to the dogs,
without warning too :).
If
On 8/9/06, Hisham Mardam Bey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/9/06, Essien Ita Essien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rapid update. Raster just informed me, this is _not_ going to happen, because the e internal widgets don't really have a long live-span and are currently just a minor convenience. They may
xcomp may have changed his opinion on this over time, but last I spoke
with him about it, he did not want to bring in additional dependencies
beyond what is currently in entrance.
On 8/9/06, Hisham Mardam Bey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/9/06, Essien Ita Essien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rapid
Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
On 8/9/06, Essien Ita Essien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rapid update. Raster just informed me, this is _not_ going to happen,
because the e internal widgets don't really have a long live-span and
are currently just a minor convenience. They may soon go to the dogs,
Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
xcomp may have changed his opinion on this over time, but last I spoke
with him about it, he did not want to bring in additional dependencies
beyond what is currently in entrance.
he's actually open to options currently. but the no dependencies thing
would be cool
Stephen Houston wrote:
snip
Its probably not a good idea to use etk or ewl because they are an
extra dependency, and its in entrances best interests to keep it
neutral. Just use evas objects, and edje for the gfx, and you'll be fine.
i've seriously considered this too. i'm going to sleep
On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 22:20:20 +0100 Essien Ita Essien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
Stephen Houston wrote:
snip
Its probably not a good idea to use etk or ewl because they are an
extra dependency, and its in entrances best interests to keep it
neutral. Just use evas objects, and edje
10 matches
Mail list logo
