Looking through some code, I stumbled upon this which doesn't seem right:
EAPI Evas *
evas_object_evas_get(const Evas_Object *obj)
{
MAGIC_CHECK(obj, Evas_Object, MAGIC_OBJ);
return NULL;
MAGIC_CHECK_END();
if (obj-delete_me) return 0;
return obj-layer-evas;
}
Shouldn't that
Christopher Michael wrote:
Looking through some code, I stumbled upon this which doesn't seem right:
EAPI Evas *
evas_object_evas_get(const Evas_Object *obj)
{
MAGIC_CHECK(obj, Evas_Object, MAGIC_OBJ);
return NULL;
MAGIC_CHECK_END();
if (obj-delete_me) return 0;
Twas brillig at 06:28:41 24.08.2009 UTC-04 when cpmicha...@comcast.net did gyre
and gimble:
CM if (obj-delete_me) return 0;
CM Shouldn't that be:
CM if (obj-delete_me) return NULL;
./linux/stddef.h:#define NULL 0
--
http://fossarchy.blogspot.com/
pgpxxDGlAnKXA.pgp
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Christopher Michael wrote:
Christopher Michael wrote:
Looking through some code, I stumbled upon this which doesn't seem right:
EAPI Evas *
evas_object_evas_get(const Evas_Object *obj)
{
MAGIC_CHECK(obj, Evas_Object, MAGIC_OBJ);
return NULL;
Christopher Michael wrote:
Christopher Michael wrote:
Looking through some code, I stumbled upon this which doesn't seem right:
EAPI Evas *
evas_object_evas_get(const Evas_Object *obj)
{
MAGIC_CHECK(obj, Evas_Object, MAGIC_OBJ);
return NULL;
MAGIC_CHECK_END();
if
Vincent Torri wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Christopher Michael wrote:
Christopher Michael wrote:
Looking through some code, I stumbled upon this which doesn't seem
right:
EAPI Evas *
evas_object_evas_get(const Evas_Object *obj)
{
MAGIC_CHECK(obj, Evas_Object, MAGIC_OBJ);
Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
Twas brillig at 06:28:41 24.08.2009 UTC-04 when cpmicha...@comcast.net did
gyre and gimble:
CM if (obj-delete_me) return 0;
CM Shouldn't that be:
CM if (obj-delete_me) return NULL;
./linux/stddef.h:#define NULL 0
And if we're not on linux ?? :)
Twas brillig at 06:55:12 24.08.2009 UTC-04 when cpmicha...@comcast.net did gyre
and gimble:
CM regardless of platform the returns are as expected.
NULL is declared as 0 in C standard. Consistency wins, I agree, but
portability is not hurt by using 0 instead of NULL.
--
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 06:07:20PM +0700, Mikhail Gusarov wrote :
Twas brillig at 06:55:12 24.08.2009 UTC-04 when cpmicha...@comcast.net did
gyre and gimble:
CM regardless of platform the returns are as expected.
NULL is declared as 0 in C standard. Consistency wins, I agree, but
