On Thu, 09 Jan 2003 21:35:12 EST, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> -O9 is ridiculous. Nothing over -O3 actually means anything, and even
> -O3 tends to be a bad idea. He referred to -O3 as "turning on all the
optimizations that probably shouldn't even be part of the optimizer."
>
>
On Friday, 10 January 2003, at 10:05:51 (+1100),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> > make CFLAGS="-O9"
> >
> > I simply guessed the flags so I do not know if they are
> > correct. raster any ideas?
>
> thats about right. i have pentium/ppro flags too but i dont know if
> gcc supports ppc specific flags,
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 12:54:50 + Chris Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> It was built with:
>
> make CFLAGS="-O9"
>
> I simply guessed the flags so I do not know if they are correct. raster
> any
> ideas?
thats about right. i have pentium/ppro flags too but i dont know if gcc supports
ppc
