On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:56:52 +0100 Andrea Suisani said:
> Hi Gustavo,
>
> On 11/19/2010 11:53 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > We already have code to launch processes at lower prio, we could
> > easily extend to do cgroup as well
>
> Good to know !
>
> /me going to look at actual code
Hi Gustavo,
On 11/19/2010 11:53 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> We already have code to launch processes at lower prio, we could
> easily extend to do cgroup as well
Good to know !
/me going to look at actual code
Andrea
> On Friday, November 19, 2010, Andrea Suisani wrote:
>> Hi All,
>
We already have code to launch processes at lower prio, we could
easily extend to do cgroup as well
On Friday, November 19, 2010, Andrea Suisani wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I was wondering if somebody is following the on-going discussion
> about exploiting the group scheduling[1] kernel feature (availab
Hi All,
I was wondering if somebody is following the on-going discussion
about exploiting the group scheduling[1] kernel feature (available
since 2.6.24) to increase "user desktop experience" (I'm not saying
that e17 is slow, on the contrary it makes bite the dust to gnome/kde
on my system :-).
B
