I think that even if a shape is not going to be rendered it is still a
graphical concept.
In most frameworks I can find it is in a graphics, geometry or gui
namespace.
Eina is already becoming ambiguous in its purpose and adding shapes in
there seems confusing.
Is it just me who is confused that
elm_path well.. it's not a concreted idea yet, but we may provide that kind of
feasible object like a elm_flip for an arbitrary shaped objects.
I don't know about elm_chart but guess it does not have a simliar concept with
path object.
Because the traditional charts have been designed for a sor
