Re: [E-devel] Is there a timeline for new terminology?

2013-01-04 Thread P Purkayastha
On 01/04/2013 04:47 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 21:08:06 +0800 P Purkayastha said: > >> The current terminology process easily eats up a Gig of hard disk space >> in 2-3 days if used heavily because it logs every keystroke and what >> not. This is quite annoyi

Re: [E-devel] Is there a timeline for new terminology?

2013-01-04 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 01 Jan 2013 21:08:06 +0800 P Purkayastha said: > The current terminology process easily eats up a Gig of hard disk space > in 2-3 days if used heavily because it logs every keystroke and what > not. This is quite annoying not only because it slows down the system, > but also can lead i

Re: [E-devel] Is there a timeline for new terminology?

2013-01-01 Thread P Purkayastha
Thanks. It looks like the fix is in svn. Maybe the devs can release 0.2.1 with this fix? :) On 01/02/2013 08:04 AM, Dave wrote: > I emailed a patch for this issue about a week and a half ago. Basically, > just edit your termptyesc.c file, and replace the #define DBG() line with the > follow

Re: [E-devel] Is there a timeline for new terminology?

2013-01-01 Thread Dave
I emailed a patch for this issue about a week and a half ago. Basically, just edit your termptyesc.c file, and replace the #define DBG() line with the following: #define DBG(...) EINA_LOG_DOM_DBG(_termpty_log_dom, __VA_ARGS__) Cheers, dave.k In the year 2013, of the month of January,

[E-devel] Is there a timeline for new terminology?

2013-01-01 Thread P Purkayastha
The current terminology process easily eats up a Gig of hard disk space in 2-3 days if used heavily because it logs every keystroke and what not. This is quite annoying not only because it slows down the system, but also can lead inadvertently to cases of full partition. This is IMHO a serious